Ca(2+)/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
Ca(2+) — no detected effect on lumbar spine bone mineral density
Evidence strength: very limited.FindingNull resultreplicated ×1“Compared with control groups (placebo/no intervention), calcium supplementation (600/1000 mg/d) had no significant effect on BMD at the lumbar spine (WMD: 0.74%; 95% CI: -0.10%, 1.59%; I2 = 47%; 95% CI: 0%, 81%; n = 527 from 5 trials) or the forearm (WMD: 0.53%; 95% CI: -0.35%, 1.42%; I2 = 55%; 95% CI: 0%, 85%; n = 415 from 4 trials).”
Quoted verbatim from Calcium supplementation for improving bone density in lactating women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Participants
- 527
- Dose
- 600/1000 mg/d calcium supplementation
- Population
- Lactating women; five randomised controlled trials, all at high risk of bias; percentage change in BMD
Effect 0.74 mean difference, 95% CI -0.1 to 1.59
Calcium supplementation for improving bone density in lactating women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.2020PMID:3240131810.1093/ajcn/nqaa103Permalink
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M5S6DXEVERMM3Q63JD4KHRRM