Ca(2+)/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
Ca(2+) — increases incidence of coronary heart disease
Evidence strength: very limited.Finding“Pooled RR of RCTs showed that the risk of CHD due to calcium supplements (CSs) increased 8% (RR = 1.08, 95% CI, 1.02-1.22; I2 = 0.0%) and increased 20% allocated to CSs alone (RR = 1.20, 95% CI, 1.08-1.33; I2 = 0.0%).”
Quoted verbatim from The Evidence and Controversy Between Dietary Calcium Intake and Calcium Supplementation and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- Pooled randomised controlled trials of calcium supplements (CSs), with or without vitamin D; the second estimate is calcium supplements alone
The Evidence and Controversy Between Dietary Calcium Intake and Calcium Supplementation and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials.2020PMID:3162581410.1080/07315724.2019.1649219Permalink
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M5S6DX3GGGS90863P5YBMK7H