thiamine/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
thiamine — no detected effect on all-cause mortality
Evidence strength: very limited.FindingNull resultreplicated ×1“Overall, compared with control group in patients with septic shock, intravenous thiamine revealed no substantial impact on mortality (odd ratio [OR] = 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI) = 0.62 to 1.21; P = 0.40), lactate change (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.04; 95% CI = -0.28 to 0.35; P = 0.82), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) change (SMD = 0.02; 95% CI = -0.18 to 0.21; P = 0.87), intensive care unit (ICU) stay (SMD = -0.02; 95% CI = -0.33 to 0.30; P = 0.90) or renal replacement therapy (OR = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.07 to 3.15; P = 0.43).”
Quoted verbatim from Intravenous thiamine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- Patients with septic shock; pooled four randomized controlled trials of intravenous thiamine
Effect 0.87 odds ratio, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.21
Intravenous thiamine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.2020PMID:3303685410.1016/j.ajem.2020.08.050Permalink
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M5MBTM0SKB83VVBQPCXZEJ77