Compound
sodium hydrogencarbonate
A white, crystalline powder that is commonly used as a pH buffering agent, an electrolyte replenisher, systemic alkalizer and in topical cleansing solutions.
Studied for
4 endpoints · 6 findings · 4 papers · 3 null
- All-cause mortalityno detected effectEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.
- Duration of mechanical ventilationraisesEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.
- Intensive care unit length of stayraisesEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.
- Systolic blood pressure (setting unspecified)raisesEvidence strength: limited. Human evidence with several recorded weaknesses, or a design that tops out at limited.
Structure
No three-dimensional record for this entry.
- Formula
- CHO3.Na
- Mass
- 84.006 g/mol
- Charge
- 0
- InChIKey
- UIIMBOGNXHQVGW-UHFFFAOYSA-M
- SMILES
- O=C([O-])O.[Na+]
- Look it up
- ChEBIBy InChIKey
Identity from ChEBI. Not evidence.
What the evidence says
How to read these marks6 findings · 4 endpoints · 4 papers · 3 null · by evidence strength
What moved
3 findings
Increases intensive care unit length of stay
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.Finding“However, SBIC was associated with significant increases in the duration of ventilation (WMD = 0.64 hours; 95% CI = 0.16 to 1.11 hours; P = 0.008; Figure 6), ICU length of stay (WMD = 2.06 days; 95% CI = 0.54 to 3.58 days; P = 0.008; Figure 7), and incidence of alkalemia (RR = 2.21; 95% CI = 1.42 to 3.42; P < 0.001; Additional file 4).”
Quoted verbatim from Sodium bicarbonate in the prevention of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Dose
- intravenous bolus plus continuous infusion, regimens varied across trials
- Population
- Adults undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, most with pre-existing renal impairment or at risk of acute kidney injury; secondary endpoint pooled from four randomized trials
Effect 2.06 mean difference, 95% CI 0.54 to 3.58
Sodium bicarbonate in the prevention of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.2014PMID:25212718Permalink
Increases duration of mechanical ventilation
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.Finding“However, SBIC was associated with significant increases in the duration of ventilation (WMD = 0.64 hours; 95% CI = 0.16 to 1.11 hours; P = 0.008; Figure 6), ICU length of stay (WMD = 2.06 days; 95% CI = 0.54 to 3.58 days; P = 0.008; Figure 7), and incidence of alkalemia (RR = 2.21; 95% CI = 1.42 to 3.42; P < 0.001; Additional file 4).”
Quoted verbatim from Sodium bicarbonate in the prevention of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Dose
- intravenous bolus plus continuous infusion, regimens varied across trials
- Population
- Adults undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, most with pre-existing renal impairment or at risk of acute kidney injury; secondary endpoint pooled from four randomized trials
Effect 0.64 mean difference, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.11
Sodium bicarbonate in the prevention of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.2014PMID:25212718Permalink
Increases systolic blood pressure (setting unspecified)
LimitedEvidence strength: limited. Human evidence with several recorded weaknesses, or a design that tops out at limited.Finding“However, higher risk of elevated systolic BP was found with sodium bicarbonate treatment (SMD, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.20; P = 0.03).”
Quoted verbatim from Sodium Bicarbonate Treatment and Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease with Metabolic Acidosis: A Meta-Analysis.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- Patients with chronic kidney disease and metabolic acidosis in randomized controlled trials; control groups defined inconsistently across trials
Effect 0.1 standardised mean difference, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.2
Sodium Bicarbonate Treatment and Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease with Metabolic Acidosis: A Meta-Analysis.2024PMID:38980732Permalink
What did not
3 findings
No detected effect on all-cause mortality
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.FindingNull resultreplicated ×1“Compared with placebo, SBIC did not alter the clinical outcomes of HLOS (WMD = 0.23 days; 95% CI = −0.88 to 1.33 days; P = 0.688; Figure 4), hospital mortality (RR = 1.37; 95% CI = 0.46 to 4.13; P = 0.572; Figure 5), RRT (RR = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.49 to 1.82; P = 0.861; Additional file 2), or POAF (RR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.65 to 1.61; P = 0.915; Additional file 3).”
Quoted verbatim from Sodium bicarbonate in the prevention of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Dose
- intravenous bolus plus continuous infusion, regimens varied across trials
- Population
- Adults undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, most with pre-existing renal impairment or at risk of acute kidney injury; secondary endpoint pooled from four randomized trials; horizon is hospital mortality
Effect 1.37 risk ratio, 95% CI 0.46 to 4.13
Sodium bicarbonate in the prevention of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.2014PMID:25212718Permalink
No detected effect on all-cause mortality
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.FindingNull resultreplicated ×1“Sodium bicarbonate therapy did not significantly reduce 90-day mortality compared to control (58.3% vs. 60.6%; risk ratio [RR], 0.96; 95%CI, 0.86-1.07; p = 0.51).”
Quoted verbatim from Sodium bicarbonate therapy in severe metabolic acidemia: an individual patient data meta-analysis of the BICAR-ICU and BICAR-ICU2 trials.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Duration
- 3 months
- Dose
- intravenous sodium bicarbonate titrated to a pH >= 7.30
- Population
- Adults with severe metabolic acidemia (pH <= 7.20) in the BICAR-ICU and BICAR-ICU2 trials, individual patient data pooled; control arm received no sodium bicarbonate
Effect 0.96 risk ratio, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.07
Sodium bicarbonate therapy in severe metabolic acidemia: an individual patient data meta-analysis of the BICAR-ICU and BICAR-ICU2 trials.2026PMID:42472834Permalink
No detected effect on systolic blood pressure (setting unspecified)
LimitedEvidence strength: limited. Human evidence with several recorded weaknesses, or a design that tops out at limited.FindingNull result“Meta-analysis suggested that sodium bicarbonate did not influence systolic BP in individuals with CKD stage G1-5.”
Quoted verbatim from Effect of Sodium Bicarbonate on Systolic Blood Pressure in CKD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- Non-dialysis-dependent adults with CKD stages G1-5 in randomized trials comparing sodium bicarbonate with placebo or usual care
Effect of Sodium Bicarbonate on Systolic Blood Pressure in CKD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.2023PMID:36758154Permalink
On the label
Labelled products
2 products
Source: NIH DSLD · Ingredient: sodium hydrogencarbonate · 2 products · Declared amount per serving: 400–455 mg (2 products)
2 labels state an amount0 do not
- Magnum NutraceuticalsOpus Red Berry Candy400 mgper 9.25 Gram(s)DSLD:236740
- Remedys NutritionAlkalize-Me-Now455 mgper 1 Vegetarian Capsule(s)DSLD:271878
Label record: NIH Office of Dietary Supplements · CC0
Papers screened
577 papers
- Compound
- sodium hydrogencarbonate
- Screened
- 577
- Admitted
- 4
- Discarded
- 91
- Not read
- 482
- Showing
- 200 of 577
Produced a finding4 papers
- PMID:252127182026-10-12
- PMID:367581542026-10-12
- PMID:389807322026-10-12
- PMID:424728342026-10-12
Discarded: the wrong intervention70 papers
- NCT00484354intervention×1 — no declared intervention names sodium hydrogencarbonate2026-09-29
- NCT00557349intervention×1 — no declared intervention names sodium hydrogencarbonate2026-09-29
- NCT00579995intervention×1 — no declared intervention names sodium hydrogencarbonate2026-09-29
- NCT00674115intervention×1 — no declared intervention names sodium hydrogencarbonate2026-09-29
- NCT00693225intervention×1 — no declared intervention names sodium hydrogencarbonate2026-09-29
- NCT00700375intervention×1 — no declared intervention names sodium hydrogencarbonate2026-09-29
- NCT00751933intervention×1 — no declared intervention names sodium hydrogencarbonate2026-09-29
- NCT00765206intervention×1 — no declared intervention names sodium hydrogencarbonate2026-09-29
- NCT00804609intervention×1 — no declared intervention names sodium hydrogencarbonate2026-09-29
- NCT00808769intervention×1 — no declared intervention names sodium hydrogencarbonate2026-09-29
- NCT00816751intervention×1 — no declared intervention names sodium hydrogencarbonate2026-09-29
- NCT00921518intervention×1 — no declared intervention names sodium hydrogencarbonate2026-09-29
and 58 more.
Discarded: another reason, stated per paper10 papers
- NCT00001337design×1 — allocation NON_RANDOMIZED -- not randomised2026-09-29
- NCT00888290design×1 — allocation NON_RANDOMIZED -- not randomised2026-09-29
- NCT01350583design×1 — allocation NA -- not randomised2026-09-29
- NCT01579162design×1 — allocation NON_RANDOMIZED -- not randomised2026-09-29
- NCT02816346design×1 — allocation NON_RANDOMIZED -- not randomised2026-09-29
- NCT03815916design×1 — allocation NON_RANDOMIZED -- not randomised2026-09-29
- NCT04992520design×1 — allocation NON_RANDOMIZED -- not randomised2026-09-29
- NCT05750459design×1 — allocation NA -- not randomised2026-09-29
- NCT05813535design×1 — allocation NA -- not randomised2026-09-29
- NCT06186622design×1 — allocation NON_RANDOMIZED -- not randomised2026-09-29
Discarded: no comparator4 papers
- PMID:25783425no claim extracted — comparator_not_absence2026-10-12
- PMID:26600623no claim extracted — comparator_not_absence2026-10-12
- PMID:26886610no claim extracted — comparator_not_absence2026-10-12
- PMID:27642111no claim extracted — comparator_not_absence2026-10-12
Discarded: no extractable result4 papers
- PMID:31542753no claim extracted — no_quantitative_result2026-10-12
- PMID:38826036no claim extracted — quote_not_self_supporting2026-10-12
- PMID:41416636claims extracted but the two passes did not agree2026-10-12
and 1 more.
Discarded: an endpoint this vocabulary does not hold3 papers
- PMID:33546730no claim extracted — no_outcome_node — measured: blood acid-base markers (pH, HCO3-, base excess), blood lactate, PCO2, pooled SMD across exercise studies | acid-base status during exercise: blood pH, HCO3-, base excess, blood lactate (BLa), PCO2, SMD pooled across exercise protocols; the oxygen uptake endpoints (VO2) are not maximal oxygen uptake by incremental test2026-10-12
and 2 more.
Not read yet482 papers
- PMID:428537112026-10-10
- PMID:182942302026-10-09
- PMID:121041082026-09-29
- PMID:129547002026-09-29
- PMID:146142102026-09-29
- PMID:163651892026-09-29
- PMID:171908442026-09-29
- PMID:174097692026-09-29
- PMID:180573062026-09-29
- PMID:192129082026-09-29
- PMID:194903582026-09-29
- PMID:195676542026-09-29
and 470 more.
Measured, not recorded
- Compound
- sodium hydrogencarbonate
- Endpoints measured
- 143 endpoints
- Recorded as a finding
- No
Show what was measured
rating of perceived exertion
no effect
Not recorded as a finding: outcome node requires the Borg scale version (6-20 or CR10) recorded with each finding; the abstract names no scale
Ratings of perceived exertion did not differ between treatments.
PMID:17507744 · one of two readings recorded this
rating of perceived exertion
no effect
In conclusion, sodium bicarbonate improves judo-related performance and increases blood lactate concentration but has no effect on perceived exertion.
PMID:17507744 · one of two readings recorded this
blood lactate concentration, Protocol 1
increases, n = 9
Not recorded as a finding: no outcome node in the list covers blood lactate concentration
Ingestion of bicarbonate increased lactate concentration in Protocol 1 (P < 0.05) but not in Protocol 2.
PMID:17507744 · one of two readings recorded this
blood lactate concentration, Protocol 2
no effect, n = 14
Not recorded as a finding: no outcome node in the list covers blood lactate concentration
Ingestion of bicarbonate increased lactate concentration in Protocol 1 (P < 0.05) but not in Protocol 2.
PMID:17507744 · one of two readings recorded this
blood lactate concentration
Not recorded as a finding: No outcome node in the list covers blood or plasma lactate concentration
Ingestion of bicarbonate increased lactate concentration in Protocol 1 (P < 0.05) but not in Protocol 2.
PMID:17507744 · one of two readings recorded this
hospital length of stay
no effect, p = 0.688
HLOS (WMD = 0.23 days; 95% CI = −0.88 to 1.33 days; P = 0.688; Figure 4)
PMID:25212718 · one of two readings recorded this
duration of ventilation
increases, p = 0.008
the duration of ventilation (WMD = 0.64 hours; 95% CI = 0.16 to 1.11 hours; P = 0.008; Figure 6)
PMID:25212718 · one of two readings recorded this
hospital mortality
no effect, p = 0.572
hospital mortality (RR = 1.37; 95% CI = 0.46 to 4.13; P = 0.572; Figure 5)
PMID:25212718 · one of two readings recorded this
ICU length of stay
increases, p = 0.008
ICU length of stay (WMD = 2.06 days; 95% CI = 0.54 to 3.58 days; P = 0.008; Figure 7)
PMID:25212718 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of alkalemia after cardiac surgery
increases, RR 2.21; 95% CI 1.42 to 3.42, p = 0.001
Not recorded as a finding: no_outcome_node: no node for alkalemia incidence
However, SBIC was associated with significant increases in the duration of ventilation (WMD = 0.64 hours; 95% CI = 0.16 to 1.11 hours; P = 0.008; Figure 6), ICU length of stay (WMD = 2.06 days; 95% CI = 0.54 to 3.58 days; P = 0.008; Figure 7), and incidence of alkalemia (RR = 2.21; 95% CI = 1.42 to 3.42; P < 0.001; Additional file 4).
PMID:25212718 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of alkalemia
increases, RR = 2.21; 95% CI = 1.42 to 3.42
Not recorded as a finding: No outcome node for alkalemia incidence
However, SBIC was associated with significant increases in the duration of ventilation (WMD = 0.64 hours; 95% CI = 0.16 to 1.11 hours; P = 0.008; Figure 6), ICU length of stay (WMD = 2.06 days; 95% CI = 0.54 to 3.58 days; P = 0.008; Figure 7), and incidence of alkalemia (RR = 2.21; 95% CI = 1.42 to 3.42; P < 0.001; Additional file 4).
PMID:25212718 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of alkalemia
increases, p = 0.001
incidence of alkalemia (RR = 2.21; 95% CI = 1.42 to 3.42; P < 0.001; Additional file 4)
PMID:25212718 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury, serum creatinine rise over 25% or 0.5 mg/dl within 5 days (four trials) or AKIN (one trial)
no effect, RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.24, p = 0.911
Not recorded as a finding: endpoint_near_miss: acute-kidney-injury-incidence requires a single named criteria set and the pool mixes creatinine rules with AKIN
Analyzed with a random-effects model, the pooled estimate of the five RCTs suggested that SBIC was not associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of CSA-AKI (RR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.78 to 1.24; P = 0.911), with a moderate heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 56.1%, heterogeneity P = 0.059).
PMID:25212718 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury
no effect, p = 0.911, n = 1079
SBIC was not associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of CSA-AKI (RR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.78 to 1.24; P = 0.911)
PMID:25212718 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of CSA-AKI, crude pooled percentage
no effect
Overall, the incidence of the CSA-AKI was 44.4% and 42.3% in the SBIC and control groups, respectively
PMID:25212718 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of CSA-AKI
no effect, p = 0.911, n = 1079
All included trials | 5 | 1,079 | 239/538 | 229/541 | 0.99 (0.78 to 1.24) | 0.911 | 56.1
PMID:25212718 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of CSA-AKI
no effect, p = 0.637, n = 542
Elective or urgent surgery | 3 | 542 | 113/268 | 110/274 | 0.88 (0.53 to 1.48) | 0.637 | 77.9
PMID:25212718 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of CSA-AKI
no effect, p = 0.628, n = 537
Elective surgery | 2 | 537 | 126/270 | 119/267 | 1.05 (0.87 to 1.26) | 0.628 | 0
PMID:25212718 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of CSA-AKI
no effect, p = 0.824, n = 969
Full-text trials | 4 | 969 | 213/483 | 203/486 | 0.97 (0.72 to 1.29) | 0.824 | 66.8
PMID:25212718 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of CSA-AKI
no effect, p = 0.867, n = 987
Large-scale trials (sample size >100) | 4 | 987 | 225/494 | 209/493 | 1.02 (0.80 to 1.31) | 0.867 | 61
PMID:25212718 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of CSA-AKI
no effect, p = 0.631, n = 552
Patients with pre-existing renal impairment or CKD | 3 | 552 | 123/273 | 110/279 | 1.08 (0.80 to 1.45) | 0.631 | 45.9
PMID:25212718 · one of two readings recorded this
postoperative atrial fibrillation
no effect, p = 0.915
POAF (RR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.65 to 1.61; P = 0.915; Additional file 3)
PMID:25212718 · one of two readings recorded this
renal replacement therapy incidence after cardiac surgery
no effect, RR = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.49 to 1.82, p = 0.861
Not recorded as a finding: No outcome node for renal replacement therapy incidence
Compared with placebo, SBIC did not alter the clinical outcomes of HLOS (WMD = 0.23 days; 95% CI = −0.88 to 1.33 days; P = 0.688; Figure 4), hospital mortality (RR = 1.37; 95% CI = 0.46 to 4.13; P = 0.572; Figure 5), RRT (RR = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.49 to 1.82; P = 0.861; Additional file 2), or POAF (RR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.65 to 1.61; P = 0.915; Additional file 3).
PMID:25212718 · both readings recorded this
renal replacement therapy
no effect, p = 0.861
RRT (RR = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.49 to 1.82; P = 0.861; Additional file 2)
PMID:25212718 · one of two readings recorded this
contrast-induced nephropathy event counts
decreases
CIN occurred in 158 of 2130 patients who received sodium bicarbonate compared with 217 of 2150 patients who received saline
PMID:25783425 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (rise in serum creatinine after contrast), intravenous sodium bicarbonate hydration versus saline hydration, in patients with pre-existing renal insufficiency; also dialysis requirement and mortality
decreases, pooled OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.96, p = 0.027
Not recorded as a finding: the comparison was against another active treatment
The pooled OR was 0.67 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.96; p=0.027), also in favour of sodium bicarbonate.
PMID:25783425 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (rise in serum creatinine of 25% or 0.5 mg/dL after contrast), intravenous sodium bicarbonate versus saline hydration in patients with pre-existing renal insufficiency; secondary: dialysis requirement, mortality
decreases
Not recorded as a finding: the comparison was against another active treatment
CIN occurred in 158 of 2130 patients who received sodium bicarbonate compared with 217 of 2150 patients who received saline, demonstrating a lower overall incidence of CIN in the sodium bicarbonate group.
PMID:25783425 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy
decreases, p = 0.027, n = 4280
The pooled OR was 0.67 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.96; p=0.027)
PMID:25783425 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy
decreases, p = 0.024, n = 219
Use | 1/219 | 0.17 (0.04 to 0.79) | Z=2.26 (p=0.024) | Not applicable
PMID:25783425 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy
decreases, p = 0.004, n = 203
Bolus | 2/203 | 0.15 (0.04 to 0.54) | Z=2.90 (p=0.004) | χ²=0.23, df=1 (p=0.632), I²=0%
PMID:25783425 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy
no effect, p = 0.091, n = 4077
Continuous | 18/4077 | 0.75 (0.53 to 1.05) | Z=1.69 (p=0.091) | χ²=30.21, df=17 (p=0.025), I²=44%
PMID:25783425 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy
no effect, p = 0.105, n = 4162
Elective | 18/4162 | 0.76 (0.54 to 1.06) | Z=1.62 (p=0.105) | χ²=29.54, df=17 (p=0.030), I²=43%
PMID:25783425 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy
decreases, p = 0.002, n = 118
Emergency | 2/118 | 0.16 (0.05 to 0.51) | Z=3.11 (p=0.002) | χ²=0.07, df=1 (p=0.784), I²=0%
PMID:25783425 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy
no effect, p = 0.351, n = 1189
Iso-osmolar | 4/1189 | 0.76 (0.43 to 1.34) | Z=0.93 (p=0.351) | χ²=4.67, df=3 (p=0.198), I²=36%
PMID:25783425 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy
decreases, p = 0.024, n = 2823
Low-osmolar | 14/2823 | 0.59 (0.37 to 0.93) | Z=2.26 (p=0.024) | χ²=26.61, df=13 (p=0.014), I²=51%
PMID:25783425 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy
no effect, p = 0.071, n = 3741
Non-use | 18/3741 | 0.71 (0.48 to 1.03) | Z=1.80 (p=0.071) | χ²=33.13, df=17 (p=0.011), I²=49%
PMID:25783425 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy
no effect, p = 0.302, n = 3707
After 2008 | 16/3707 | 0.85 (0.62 to 1.16) | Z=1.03 (p=0.302) | χ²=22.13, df=15 (p=0.105), I²=32%
PMID:25783425 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy
decreases, n = 573
Before 2008 | 4/573 | 0.19 (0.09 to 0.41) | Z=4.26 (p=0.000) | χ²=1.06, df=10 (p=0.788), I²=0%
PMID:25783425 · one of two readings recorded this
mortality event counts
no effect
There were 15 deaths in 1279 patients treated with sodium bicarbonate and 22 in 1280 patients treated with saline
PMID:25783425 · one of two readings recorded this
mortality
no effect, p = 0.263, n = 2559
Although there was no significant difference between the two arms (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.32; p=0.263)
PMID:25783425 · one of two readings recorded this
requirement for dialysis event counts
no effect
Overall, 14 of 1809 patients treated with sodium bicarbonate compared with 13 of 1824 patients treated with saline underwent dialysis
PMID:25783425 · one of two readings recorded this
requirement for dialysis
no effect, p = 0.841, n = 3633
No statistically significant difference was observed (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.52 to 2.25; p=0.841)
PMID:25783425 · one of two readings recorded this
CIN risk meta-regression on contrast volume
no effect, p = 0.59
the contrast volume did not have a statistically significant effect on the risk of CIN (p= 0.59)
PMID:26600623 · one of two readings recorded this
CIN risk meta-regression on diabetes
increases, p = 0.034
a statistically significant relationship between diabetes and the risk of CIN was found (p= 0.034)
PMID:26600623 · one of two readings recorded this
contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN)
decreases, p = 0.001, n = 5686
(RD= -0.03; 95% CI= -0.05 to 0.00; I2= 70%; p <0.001; Fig. 3)
PMID:26600623 · one of two readings recorded this
contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN)
unclear, p = 0.001
for CIN, an RD of 0.05 was found with a 95% CI of -0.09 to 0.00 (I2=70%; p <0.001; Fig. 6)
PMID:26600623 · one of two readings recorded this
contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN)
no effect, p = 0.001
the group that received SB experienced 120 events out of 1,526 (7.86%) vs. 166 events out of 1,563 (10.62%) in the 0.9% NSS group (RD= -0.03; 95% CI= -0.07 to 0.01; I2= 69%; p <0.001; Fig. 5)
PMID:26600623 · one of two readings recorded this
contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN)
no effect, p = 0.001
117 events out of 1,148 (10.2%) occurred in the SB group vs. 133 events out of 1,149 (11.50%) in the 0.9% NSS group (RD= -0.01; 95% CI= -0.06 to 0.03; I2= 72%; p <0.001; Fig. 5)
PMID:26600623 · one of two readings recorded this
contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN)
decreases, p = 0.001
the results favored the use of SB; however, heterogeneity was high (RD= -0.04; 95% CI= -0.08 to 0.00; I2= 77%; p <0.001; Fig. 4)
PMID:26600623 · one of two readings recorded this
contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN)
no effect, p = 0.83
82 of 794 patients developed CIN in the SB group vs. 83 of 810 patients in the control group (RD= 0.00; 95% CI= -0.02 to 0.03; p= 0.83; I2= 0%; Fig. 4)
PMID:26600623 · one of two readings recorded this
contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN)
no effect, p = 0.001
In the studies in which NAC was not used, no difference was found (RD= -0.02; 95% CI= -0.05 to 0.02; I2= 70%; p <0.001; Fig. 6)
PMID:26600623 · one of two readings recorded this
contrast-induced nephropathy event counts
decreases
among the patients using SB, 9.03% (255/2,824) developed CIN, and among the 0.9% NSS group, 11.67% (334/2,862) developed CIN
PMID:26600623 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (GFR fall over 25% or serum creatinine rise over 0.5 mg/dL), intravenous sodium bicarbonate versus 0.9% saline; also need for renal replacement therapy and mortality within 28 days
decreases, RD -0.03; 95% CI -0.05 to 0.00 (all studies; low-risk-of-bias subgroup RD 0.00)
Not recorded as a finding: the comparison was against another active treatment
The assessment of the primary outcome indicated that the risk of developing CIN was lower among similar group that received SB; however, high heterogeneity was observed among the studies (RD= -0.03; 95% CI= -0.05 to 0.00; I2= 70%; p <0.001; Fig. 3).
PMID:26600623 · one of two readings recorded this
mortality
no effect, p = 0.95
this event was infrequent among the two groups (RD= 0.00; 95% CI= -0.00 to 0.01; I2= 0%; p= 0.95)
PMID:26600623 · one of two readings recorded this
mortality
no effect, p = 0.51
no statistically significant reduction in risk was found, with an RD= -0.00 (95% CI= -0.001 to 0.001; I2= 0%; p= 0.51; Fig. 8)
PMID:26600623 · one of two readings recorded this
need for renal replacement therapy (RRT)
no effect, p = 1
such events were rare in all of the studies (RD= 0.00; 95% CI= -0.00 to 0.00; I2= 0%; p= 1; Fig. 7)
PMID:26600623 · one of two readings recorded this
need for renal replacement therapy (RRT)
no effect, p = 0.99
Similar results were observed when RRT was assessed in the studies that had a good methodology, with an RD= 0.00 (95% CI= -0001 to 0.01; I2= 0%; p= 0.99; Fig. 7)
PMID:26600623 · one of two readings recorded this
change in estimated glomerular filtration rate
decreases, p = 0.013
and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (SMD -0.17 95% CI: -0.30 to -0.04, P = 0.013)
PMID:26886610 · one of two readings recorded this
change in serum creatinine
decreases, p = 0.011
decreasing the change in serum creatinine (SCr) (SMD -0.31 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.07, P = 0.011)
PMID:26886610 · one of two readings recorded this
contrast-induced acute kidney injury incidence after coronary angiography and/or PCI, sodium bicarbonate hydration versus sodium chloride hydration; also change in serum creatinine, eGFR, dialysis, mortality, length of hospital stay
decreases, RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.47-0.96, p = 0.029
Not recorded as a finding: the comparison was against another active treatment
Hydration with sodium bicarbonate showed significant beneficial effects in preventing CI-AKI (RR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.47-0.96, P = 0.029), decreasing the change in serum creatinine (SCr) (SMD -0.31 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.07, P = 0.011) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (SMD -0.17 95% CI: -0.30 to -0.04, P = 0.013).
PMID:26886610 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury after coronary angiography and/or PCI, sodium bicarbonate hydration versus sodium chloride hydration; also change in serum creatinine and eGFR, dialysis, mortality, length of hospital stay
decreases, RR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.47-0.96, p = 0.029
Not recorded as a finding: the comparison was against another active treatment
Hydration with sodium bicarbonate showed significant beneficial effects in preventing CI-AKI (RR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.47-0.96, P = 0.029), decreasing the change in serum creatinine (SCr) (SMD -0.31 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.07, P = 0.011) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (SMD -0.17 95% CI: -0.30 to -0.04, P = 0.013).
PMID:26886610 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury
decreases, p = 0.029
Hydration with sodium bicarbonate showed significant beneficial effects in preventing CI-AKI (RR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.47-0.96, P = 0.029)
PMID:26886610 · one of two readings recorded this
length of hospital stay
no effect, p = 0.279
reducing the length of hospital stay (LHS) (WMD -1.47; 95% CI: -4.14 to 1.20, P = 0.279)
PMID:26886610 · one of two readings recorded this
mortality
no effect, p = 0.204
mortality (RR 0.71; 95% CI: 0.41-1.21, P = 0.204)
PMID:26886610 · one of two readings recorded this
requirement for dialysis
no effect, p = 0.729
But no significant differences were observed in the requirement for dialysis (RR 1.11; 95% CI: 0.60-2.07, P = 0.729)
PMID:26886610 · one of two readings recorded this
all-cause mortality hazard at 1 year, time from randomization to death, periprocedural intravenous sodium bicarbonate versus intravenous sodium chloride in patients undergoing coronary angiography
decreases, HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.89, p = 0.011, n = 2764
Not recorded as a finding: the comparison was against another active treatment
In 10 trials with a total of 2,764 participants, sodium bicarbonate was associated with lower mortality hazard than sodium chloride at 1 year (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41 to 0.89, p = 0.011).
PMID:27642111 · one of two readings recorded this
all-cause mortality hazard, time from randomization to death, up to 1 year, intravenous sodium bicarbonate versus intravenous sodium chloride periprocedural to coronary angiography
decreases, hazard ratio 0.61, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.89, p = 0.011, n = 2764
Not recorded as a finding: the comparison was against another active treatment
In 10 trials with a total of 2,764 participants, sodium bicarbonate was associated with lower mortality hazard than sodium chloride at 1 year (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41 to 0.89, p = 0.011).
PMID:27642111 · one of two readings recorded this
all-cause mortality hazard
decreases, p = 0.011, n = 2764
sodium bicarbonate was associated with lower mortality hazard than sodium chloride at 1 year (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41 to 0.89, p = 0.011)
PMID:27642111 · one of two readings recorded this
incidence of contrast-associated nephropathy
decreases, p = 0.003
Although periprocedural sodium bicarbonate was associated with a reduction in the incidence of CAN (relative risk 0.75, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.91, p = 0.003)
PMID:27642111 · one of two readings recorded this
interaction between effect on mortality and occurrence of contrast-associated nephropathy
increases, p = 0.001
there exists a statistically significant interaction between the effect on mortality and the occurrence of CAN (hazard ratio 5.65, 95% CI 3.58 to 8.92, p <0.001)
PMID:27642111 · one of two readings recorded this
all-cause mortality
decreases
Treatment with lipid-modifying drugs led to a 36% reduction in cardiovascular disease and 26% reduction in all-cause mortality
PMID:31542753 · one of two readings recorded this
cardiovascular disease
decreases
Treatment with lipid-modifying drugs led to a 36% reduction in cardiovascular disease and 26% reduction in all-cause mortality
PMID:31542753 · one of two readings recorded this
final renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
no effect
For RCTs of antihypertensive drugs, there were no significant differences in renal function
PMID:31542753 · one of two readings recorded this
final renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
increases
Final renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate) was 6% higher in those taking glycaemic control drugs (ROM 1.06, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.10, I2=0%, low GRADE confidence)
PMID:31542753 · one of two readings recorded this
final renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
increases
and 4% higher in those taking lipid-modifying drugs (ROM 1.04, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.08, I2=88%, very low GRADE confidence)
PMID:31542753 · one of two readings recorded this
pH
increases, p = 0.001
improves pH (SMD = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.79, P < 0.001; I2 = 69%)
PMID:33546730 · one of two readings recorded this
base excess (BE)
increases, p = 0.001
BE (SMD = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.16 to 2.19, P < 0.001, I2 = 77%)
PMID:33546730 · one of two readings recorded this
bicarbonate ion (HCO3-)
increases, p = 0.001
HCO3- (SMD = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.10 to 2.17, P < 0.001; I2 = 80%)
PMID:33546730 · one of two readings recorded this
blood lactate (BLa)
increases, p = 0.001
BLa (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.34 to 1.11, P < 0.001, I2 = 68%)
PMID:33546730 · one of two readings recorded this
blood pH, bicarbonate ion (HCO3-), base excess, blood lactate, PCO2 during exercise, SMD pooled; and VO2, VCO2, PO2 (no difference)
increases, pH SMD = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.79; HCO3- SMD = 1.63; BE SMD = 1.67; BLa SMD = 0.72; PCO2 SMD = 0.51
Not recorded as a finding: this platform holds no node for the endpoint
The meta-analysis indicated that NaHCO3 ingestion improves pH (SMD = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.79, P < 0.001; I2 = 69%), HCO3- (SMD = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.10 to 2.17, P < 0.001; I2 = 80%), BE (SMD = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.16 to 2.19, P < 0.001, I2 = 77%), BLa (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.34 to 1.11, P < 0.001, I2 = 68%) and PCO2 (SMD = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.90, P = 0.009, I2 = 0%) but there were no differences between VO2, VCO2 and PO2 compared with the placebo condition.
PMID:33546730 · one of two readings recorded this
carbon dioxide production (VCO2)
no effect
there were no differences between VO2, VCO2 and PO2 compared with the placebo condition
PMID:33546730 · one of two readings recorded this
oxygen uptake (VO2)
no effect
there were no differences between VO2, VCO2 and PO2 compared with the placebo condition
PMID:33546730 · one of two readings recorded this
partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2)
increases, p = 0.009
PCO2 (SMD = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.90, P = 0.009, I2 = 0%)
PMID:33546730 · one of two readings recorded this
partial pressure of oxygen (PO2)
no effect
there were no differences between VO2, VCO2 and PO2 compared with the placebo condition
PMID:33546730 · one of two readings recorded this
antihypertensive medication use, change after sodium bicarbonate
no effect
Not recorded as a finding: no_outcome_node: no node for antihypertensive medication requirement
Similarly, there was no significant increase in the use of antihypertensive medication or diuretics in individuals taking sodium bicarbonate, whereas there was a greater decrease in antihypertensive medication use in individuals taking sodium bicarbonate compared with controls.
PMID:36758154 · one of two readings recorded this
decrease in antihypertensive medication use
decreases
whereas there was a greater decrease in antihypertensive medication use in individuals taking sodium bicarbonate compared with controls
PMID:36758154 · one of two readings recorded this
systolic blood pressure
no effect
Meta-analysis suggested that sodium bicarbonate did not influence systolic BP in individuals with CKD stage G1-5
PMID:36758154 · one of two readings recorded this
systolic blood pressure
no effect
Results were consistent when stratifying by dose of sodium bicarbonate or duration of intervention
PMID:36758154 · one of two readings recorded this
use of antihypertensive medication or diuretics
no effect
there was no significant increase in the use of antihypertensive medication or diuretics in individuals taking sodium bicarbonate
PMID:36758154 · one of two readings recorded this
duration of hospitalization
decreases, p = 0.0001
a significant reduction in the duration of hospitalization in alkalinization group compared to controls with very low certainty of evidence (SMD −0.66, 95% CI: −0.97 to −0.35; I2 = 36%; p <.0001; Figure 3)
PMID:38826036 · one of two readings recorded this
duration of recovery
no effect, p = 0.06
a nonsignificant reduction in recovery time in alkalinization group compared to controls with low certainty of evidence (SMD −1.18, 95% CI: −2.42-0.05; I2 = 97%; p =.06; Figure 3)
PMID:38826036 · one of two readings recorded this
hospitalization rate
no effect, p = 0.3
no significant reduction in hospitalization rate in alkalinization group compared to controls with very low certainty of evidence (RR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.24-1.56; I2 = 80%; p =.30; Figure 2)
PMID:38826036 · one of two readings recorded this
mortality rate, pooled RR across 2 RCTs and 2 cohorts of alkalinization versus controls in COVID-19; duration of hospitalization, SMD
decreases, p = 0.02
Not recorded as a finding: the supporting sentence never names the compound
The results of our meta-analysis showed significant reduction in mortality rate in alkalinization group compared to controls (RR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56-0.95; I2 = 0%; p =.02; Figure 2).
PMID:38826036 · one of two readings recorded this
mortality rate, pooled RR across 2 RCTs and 2 cohorts of COVID-19 patients given alkalinization (sodium bicarbonate by nasal irrigation, inhalation or oral) versus standard of care or placebo; RCT-only subgroup not significant
decreases, p = 0.02
Not recorded as a finding: the supporting sentence never names the compound
The results of our meta-analysis showed significant reduction in mortality rate in alkalinization group compared to controls (RR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56-0.95; I2 = 0%; p =.02; Figure 2).
PMID:38826036 · one of two readings recorded this
mortality
decreases, p = 0.02
significant reduction in mortality rate in alkalinization group compared to controls (RR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56-0.95; I2 = 0%; p =.02; Figure 2)
PMID:38826036 · one of two readings recorded this
mortality
no effect
our subgroup analysis showed no significant improvement in RCT only studies (RR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.59-1.05
PMID:38826036 · one of two readings recorded this
recovery rate
increases, p = 0.0005
a significant improvement in recovery rate in alkalinization group compared to controls with low certainty of evidence (RR 2.13, 95% CI: 1.39-3.26; I2 = 0%; p =.0005; Figure 2)
PMID:38826036 · one of two readings recorded this
recovery rate
no effect
our subgroup analysis showed no significant improvement in cohorts (RR 1.72, 95% CI: 0.97-3.06; I2 = 0%; Supplementary Figure 2)
PMID:38826036 · one of two readings recorded this
all-cause mortality
no effect, no significant difference
Not recorded as a finding: Only sentence is agentless, names no compound and states no follow-up horizon, which the all-cause-mortality node requires
No significant difference in all-cause mortality was noted.
PMID:38980732 · both readings recorded this
all-cause mortality
no effect
No significant difference in all-cause mortality was noted
PMID:38980732 · one of two readings recorded this
eGFR
increases, p = 0.03, n = 2037
Fourteen RCTs comprising 2037 patients demonstrated that sodium bicarbonate supplementation significantly improved eGFR (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03 to 0.63; P = 0.03)
PMID:38980732 · one of two readings recorded this
change in eGFR, SMD
increases, SMD 0.33; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.63, p = 0.03
Not recorded as a finding: instrument_not_stated: egfr node requires a stated estimating equation and the abstract names none
Fourteen RCTs comprising 2037 patients demonstrated that sodium bicarbonate supplementation significantly improved eGFR (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03 to 0.63; P = 0.03).
PMID:38980732 · one of two readings recorded this
hospitalization rate (odds ratio), patients with CKD and metabolic acidosis
decreases, odds ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.55
Not recorded as a finding: No outcome node for all-cause hospitalization rate in CKD
The group receiving sodium bicarbonate had a lower hospitalization rate (odds ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.55; P < 0.001).
PMID:38980732 · one of two readings recorded this
hospitalization rate, odds ratio
decreases, OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.55, p = 0.001
Not recorded as a finding: no_outcome_node: no node for all-cause hospitalisation rate in CKD
The group receiving sodium bicarbonate had a lower hospitalization rate (odds ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.55; P < 0.001).
PMID:38980732 · one of two readings recorded this
hospitalization rate
decreases, p = 0.001
The group receiving sodium bicarbonate had a lower hospitalization rate (odds ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.55; P < 0.001)
PMID:38980732 · one of two readings recorded this
mid-arm muscle circumference, SMD
increases, SMD, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.38, p = 0.003
Not recorded as a finding: No outcome node for mid-arm muscle circumference; not the lean-mass node's DXA or FFM construct
Higher mid-arm muscle circumference was observed with sodium bicarbonate treatment compared with those without (SMD, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.38; P = 0.003, I2<0.001).
PMID:38980732 · both readings recorded this
mid-arm muscle circumference
increases, p = 0.003
Higher mid-arm muscle circumference was observed with sodium bicarbonate treatment compared with those without (SMD, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.38; P = 0.003, I2<0.001)
PMID:38980732 · one of two readings recorded this
systolic blood pressure
increases, p = 0.03
However, higher risk of elevated systolic BP was found with sodium bicarbonate treatment (SMD, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.20; P = 0.03)
PMID:38980732 · one of two readings recorded this
continuous running performance, SMD pooled across fixed-distance time trials, time to exhaustion at fixed workloads, fixed-duration trial and graded exercise test
no effect, publication-bias adjusted SMD = 0.18; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.36, p = 0.06
Not recorded as a finding: Pooled running-only composite across mixed tests; the pooled-exercise-performance-composite node covers aerobic, anaerobic and resistance tests with sign-alignment, a different population of tests; also the unadjusted estimate was significant and the adjusted one not, so no single whole-population direction
After adjustment for publication bias, the benefit of SB on running performance became negligible and not statically significant (SMD = 0.18; 95% CI: −0.01, 0.36; p = 0.06; I2 = 0%).
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
continuous running performance, SMD pooled across fixed-distance time trials, time-to-exhaustion tests, a fixed-duration trial and a graded exercise test after single-dose oral sodium bicarbonate versus placebo
no effect, SMD 0.18; 95% CI -0.01, 0.36, p = 0.06
Not recorded as a finding: a node exists but the paper states a different instrument or population
After adjustment for publication bias, the benefit of SB on running performance became negligible and not statically significant (SMD = 0.18; 95% CI: −0.01, 0.36; p = 0.06; I2 = 0%).
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
continuous running performance
increases, p = 0.001, n = 126
After intent-to-treat adjustment for GI-related study withdrawals, the treatment effect remained small and statistically significant (SMD = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.11, 0.47; p = 0.001)
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
continuous running performance
no effect, p = 0.06, n = 126
After adjustment for publication bias, the benefit of SB on running performance became negligible and not statically significant (SMD = 0.18; 95% CI: −0.01, 0.36; p = 0.06; I2 = 0%)
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
continuous running performance
increases, p = 0.001, n = 126
SB supplementation resulted in a small statistically significant benefit on continuous running performance (SMD = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.50; p < 0.001)
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
continuous running performance
increases, p = 0.001
In a post hoc analysis of the eight male-only studies, the intent-to-treat and publication bias-adjusted treatment effect was small and statistically significant (SMD = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.63; p < 0.001)
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
gastrointestinal symptoms before or during the performance test, proportion of participants
increases, 29.5% vs. 2.6%; odds ratio = 5.9; 95% CI: 1.8, 18.8, p = 0.003
Not recorded as a finding: supplement-adverse-event-incidence requires occurrence of any adverse event; this is GI symptoms only, a subset
GI symptoms before or during the performance tests were more frequent with SB than placebo (29.5% vs. 2.6%; odds ratio = 5.9; 95% CI: 1.8, 18.8; p = 0.003).
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
gastrointestinal symptoms
increases, p = 0.003
GI symptoms before or during the performance tests were more frequent with SB than placebo (29.5% vs. 2.6%; odds ratio = 5.9; 95% CI: 1.8, 18.8; p = 0.003)
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
meta-regression of SB benefit: earlier publication date
no effect, p = 0.29
Earlier publication date | 1.05 | 0.29
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
meta-regression of SB benefit: fewer washout days between performance tests
no effect, p = 0.78
Fewer washout days between performance tests | 0.29 | 0.78
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
meta-regression of SB benefit: higher absolute SB dosage
no effect, p = 0.28
Higher absolute SB dosage | 1.09 | 0.28
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
meta-regression of SB benefit: higher body mass index
no effect, p = 0.24
Higher body mass index | 1.18 | 0.24
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
meta-regression of SB benefit: higher body mass
modulates, p = 0.04
Higher body mass | 2.08 | 0.04
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
meta-regression of SB benefit: higher percentage of male subjects
modulates, p = 0.03
Higher percentage of male subjects | 2.12 | 0.03
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
meta-regression of SB benefit: longer performance test time
no effect, p = 0.62
Longer performance test time | 0.50 | 0.62
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
meta-regression of SB benefit: longer SB ingestion time
no effect, p = 0.11
Longer SB ingestion time | 1.60 | 0.11
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
meta-regression of SB benefit: older age
no effect, p = 0.61
Older age | 0.51 | 0.61
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
meta-regression of SB benefit: SB dosing form (capsule vs. powder)
no effect, p = 0.52
SB dosing form (capsule vs. powder) | 0.65 | 0.52
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
meta-regression of SB benefit: SB ingestion fasted vs. with food
no effect, p = 0.51
SB ingestion fasted vs. with food | 0.66 | 0.51
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
meta-regression of SB benefit: shorter time between SB ingestion and exercise
no effect, p = 0.99
Shorter time between SB ingestion and exercise | 0.02 | 0.99
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
meta-regression of SB benefit: smaller sample size
no effect, p = 0.06
Smaller sample size | 1.91 | 0.06
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
meta-regression of SB benefit: sodium-based placebo
no effect, p = 0.5
Sodium-based placebo | 0.68 | 0.50
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
meta-regression of SB benefit: submaximal running prior to performance test
no effect, p = 0.43
Submaximal running prior to performance test | 0.79 | 0.43
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
meta-regression of SB benefit: trained runners vs. non-runners
no effect, p = 0.44
Trained runners vs. non-runners | 0.77 | 0.44
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
study withdrawal due to GI symptoms
increases, p = 0.049
occurred more frequently with SB than placebo (8.7% vs. 1.6%; odds ratio = 2.9; 95% CI: 1.0, 8.1; p = 0.049)
PMID:41416636 · one of two readings recorded this
90-day mortality
no effect, p = 0.51
Sodium bicarbonate therapy did not significantly reduce 90-day mortality compared to control (58.3% vs. 60.6%; risk ratio [RR], 0.96; 95%CI, 0.86-1.07; p = 0.51)
PMID:42472834 · one of two readings recorded this
90-day mortality
decreases, p = 0.004
in patients with pH ≤ 7.10, sodium bicarbonate reduced 90-day mortality (RR, 0.80; 95%CI, 0.68-0.93; p = 0.004)
PMID:42472834 · one of two readings recorded this
dialysis-free days, incidence rate ratio
increases, IRR 1.10; 95%CI 1.06-1.14, p = 0.001
Not recorded as a finding: no_outcome_node: no outcome node for dialysis-free days
However, it significantly reduced RRT initiation (34.8% vs. 50.7%; RR, 0.69; 95%CI, 0.60-0.79; p < 0.001, number needed to treat: 6.3) and increased dialysis-free days (incidence rate ratio, 1.10; 95%CI, 1.06-1.14; p < 0.001).
PMID:42472834 · one of two readings recorded this
dialysis-free days
increases, p = 0.001
increased dialysis-free days (incidence rate ratio, 1.10; 95%CI, 1.06-1.14; p < 0.001)
PMID:42472834 · one of two readings recorded this
renal replacement therapy initiation, proportion of patients; dialysis-free days
decreases, RRT 34.8% vs. 50.7%; RR 0.69, 95%CI 0.60-0.79
Not recorded as a finding: No outcome node for renal replacement therapy initiation or dialysis-free days
However, it significantly reduced RRT initiation (34.8% vs. 50.7%; RR, 0.69; 95%CI, 0.60-0.79; p < 0.001, number needed to treat: 6.3) and increased dialysis-free days (incidence rate ratio, 1.10; 95%CI, 1.06-1.14; p < 0.001).
PMID:42472834 · one of two readings recorded this
renal replacement therapy initiation, proportion of patients
decreases, RR 0.69; 95%CI 0.60-0.79, p = 0.001
Not recorded as a finding: no_outcome_node: no outcome node for renal replacement therapy use
However, it significantly reduced RRT initiation (34.8% vs. 50.7%; RR, 0.69; 95%CI, 0.60-0.79; p < 0.001, number needed to treat: 6.3) and increased dialysis-free days (incidence rate ratio, 1.10; 95%CI, 1.06-1.14; p < 0.001).
PMID:42472834 · one of two readings recorded this
renal replacement therapy initiation
decreases, p = 0.001
it significantly reduced RRT initiation (34.8% vs. 50.7%; RR, 0.69; 95%CI, 0.60-0.79; p < 0.001, number needed to treat: 6.3)
PMID:42472834 · one of two readings recorded this
treatment-effect interaction on 90-day mortality by acidemia depth
modulates, p = 0.006
A significant interaction was observed with acidemia depth (p-for-interaction = 0.006)
PMID:42472834 · one of two readings recorded this
treatment-effect interaction on 90-day mortality by serum lactate
no effect, p = 0.22
No significant interactions were observed for severe AKI status (p-for-interaction = 0.11) nor serum lactate (p-for-interaction = 0.22)
PMID:42472834 · one of two readings recorded this
treatment-effect interaction on 90-day mortality by severe AKI status
no effect, p = 0.11
No significant interactions were observed for severe AKI status (p-for-interaction = 0.11) nor serum lactate (p-for-interaction = 0.22)
PMID:42472834 · one of two readings recorded this
Sources cited
4 papers
- Subject
- sodium hydrogencarbonate
- Findings
- 6
- Papers
- 4
Sodium bicarbonate therapy in severe metabolic acidemia: an individual patient data meta-analysis of the BICAR-ICU and BICAR-ICU2 trials.record2026PMID:424728341 finding
Sodium Bicarbonate Treatment and Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease with Metabolic Acidosis: A Meta-Analysis.record2024PMID:389807321 finding
Effect of Sodium Bicarbonate on Systolic Blood Pressure in CKD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.record2023PMID:367581541 finding
Sodium bicarbonate in the prevention of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.record2014PMID:252127183 findings
Other names
10 names
Resolves to: sodium hydrogencarbonate
- Also called
- baking sodabicarbonate of sodacarbonic acid monosodium saltE 500E-500E500NaHCO3sodium acid carbonateSodium bicarbonatesodium hydrogen carbonate