Papers/PMID:38713430
Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgical site infection in abdominal surgery between triclosan-coated and uncoated sutures.
Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2024The record
1 finding · 1 compound · 1 endpoint
What it reported
How to read these marksWhat moved
1 finding
triclosan — decreases wound infection incidence
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.Findingreplicated ×2“According to the meta-analysis, the overall incidence of SSI was statistically significantly lower with the use of triclosan-coated sutures compared to uncoated sutures, 14.8% vs. 17.3% respectively, OR 0.84 (95% CI [0.75,0.93], p = 0.001),.”
Quoted verbatim from Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgical site infection in abdominal surgery between triclosan-coated and uncoated sutures.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- Adults undergoing open or laparoscopic abdominal surgery with fascial closure by triclosan-coated versus uncoated polydioxanone or polyglactin 910 sutures (11 RCTs)
Effect 0.84 odds ratio, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.93
Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgical site infection in abdominal surgery between triclosan-coated and uncoated sutures.2024PMID:38713430An author is affiliated with a producerPermalink