triclosan/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
Decreases wound infection incidence
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.Findingreplicated ×2“According to the meta-analysis, the overall incidence of SSI was statistically significantly lower with the use of triclosan-coated sutures compared to uncoated sutures, 14.8% vs. 17.3% respectively, OR 0.84 (95% CI [0.75,0.93], p = 0.001),.”
Quoted verbatim from Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgical site infection in abdominal surgery between triclosan-coated and uncoated sutures.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- Adults undergoing open or laparoscopic abdominal surgery with fascial closure by triclosan-coated versus uncoated polydioxanone or polyglactin 910 sutures (11 RCTs)
Effect 0.84 odds ratio, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.93
Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgical site infection in abdominal surgery between triclosan-coated and uncoated sutures.2024PMID:38713430An author is affiliated with a producerPermalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on triclosan
- Every compound studied against Wound infection incidence
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M45M9Z857FARFFGT2C5MEH60