Ca(2+)/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
Ca(2+) — no detected effect on hip fracture incidence
Evidence strength: very limited.FindingNull resultreplicated ×3“In women (7 prospective cohort studies, 170,991 women, 2,954 hip fractures), there was no association between total calcium intake and hip fracture risk [pooled risk ratio (RR) per 300 mg total Ca/d = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.97, 1.05].”
Quoted verbatim from Calcium intake and hip fracture risk in men and women: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Participants
- 170,991
- Dose
- per 300 mg total Ca/d
- Population
- Women in 7 prospective cohort studies; total calcium intake from diet and supplements, per 300 mg/d increment
Effect 1.01 risk ratio, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.05
Calcium intake and hip fracture risk in men and women: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials.2007PMID:1806559910.1093/ajcn/86.5.1780Permalink
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M5S80EDYHGRT992Y1G88X1E8