folic acid/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on colorectal adenoma recurrence after polypectomy
Very limitedEvidence strength: very limited. Human evidence with major recorded weaknesses, or non-human, uncontrolled or unverified evidence.FindingNull result“Incidence of at least one recurrent adenoma was not significantly associated with folic acid supplementation [relative risk (RR): 0.82; 95% CI: 0.59,1.13; P = 0.22].”
Quoted verbatim from A randomized trial on folic acid supplementation and risk of recurrent colorectal adenoma.. - Study
- RCT
- Dose
- 1 mg/d
- Population
- Participants of the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study and Nurses' Health Study with prior adenoma, randomised to folic acid or placebo; whole-population primary endpoint
Effect 0.82 risk ratio, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.13
A randomized trial on folic acid supplementation and risk of recurrent colorectal adenoma.2009PMID:19864409Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on folic acid
- Every compound studied against Colorectal adenoma recurrence after polypectomy
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M5RY7S5CCQ9PFWSWHJ5W1JQD