Ca(2+)/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
Ca(2+) — increases prostate cancer incidence
Evidence strength: very limited.Findingreplicated ×1“Men in the highest quartile of total calcium intake (> 1059 mg/day) had a more than two-fold increased risk of prostate cancer (advanced or localized) vs. men in the lowest quartile (<488 mg/day) (OR = 2.20, 95% CI= 1.40, 3.46, p for trend= 0.01).”
Quoted verbatim from Calcium intake and prostate cancer among African Americans: effect modification by vitamin D receptor calcium absorption genotype.. - Study
- case-control
- Dose
- highest quartile of total calcium intake (>1059 mg/day) vs lowest (<488 mg/day), food frequency questionnaire
- Population
- African-American men in the California Collaborative Prostate Cancer Study; advanced and localized prostate cancer cases combined versus population controls; highest versus lowest quartile of total calcium intake from foods, beverages and supplements
Effect 2.2 odds ratio, 95% CI 1.4 to 3.46
Calcium intake and prostate cancer among African Americans: effect modification by vitamin D receptor calcium absorption genotype.2012PMID:2188770710.1002/jbmr.505Permalink
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M5RWPKRN221QT8D42TME45DW