calciol/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
calciol — no detected effect on all-cause mortality
Evidence strength: very limited.FindingNull resultreplicated ×5“In intention-to-treat analyses, mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.85-1.02], vascular disease mortality (HR = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.79-1.05), cancer mortality (HR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.68-1.06), and cancer incidence (HR = 1.07; 95% CI = 0.92-1.25) did not differ significantly between participants allocated vitamin D and those not.”
Quoted verbatim from Long-term follow-up for mortality and cancer in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of vitamin D(3) and/or calcium (RECORD trial).. - Study
- RCT
- Dose
- vitamin D3 800 IU daily
- Population
- People aged at least 70 years with previous low-trauma fracture; 2x2 factorial, vitamin D3 versus no vitamin D3 (calcium allocation balanced across the comparison); follow-up 3 years after 24-62 months of treatment
Effect 0.93 hazard ratio, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.02
Long-term follow-up for mortality and cancer in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of vitamin D(3) and/or calcium (RECORD trial).2012PMID:2211280410.1210/jc.2011-1309Permalink
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M5KVR0VKFS3ARKVECMM9K13A