magnesium(2+)/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on incidence of myocardial infarction
LimitedEvidence strength: limited. Human evidence with several recorded weaknesses, or a design that tops out at limited.FindingNull result“The association of drinking water magnesium with myocardial infarction was not significant (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.70, 1.20 for the highest tertile compared to the lowest; Table 5).”
Quoted verbatim from Calcium and magnesium in drinking water and risk of myocardial infarction and stroke-a population-based cohort study.. - Study
- cohort
- Dose
- drinking water magnesium, highest tertile (10.6-13.8 mg/L) vs lowest (0.6-4.5 mg/L)
- Population
- Women of the Swedish Mammography Cohort (n = 26,733) served by public drinking water; highest versus lowest tertile of drinking water magnesium, model adjusted for drinking water calcium
Effect 0.91 hazard ratio, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.2
Calcium and magnesium in drinking water and risk of myocardial infarction and stroke-a population-based cohort study.2022PMID:35816459Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on magnesium(2+)
- Every compound studied against Incidence of myocardial infarction
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M5KBMPMQKD0TR6GZE7Z4CFY0