Ca(2+)/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
Decreases pre-eclampsia incidence
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.Findingreplicated ×1“Pooled analysis showed that calcium supplementation during pregnancy was associated with a significant reduction of 45% in risk of gestational hypertension [Relative risk (RR) 0.55; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.36-0.85] and 59% in the risk of pre-eclampsia [RR 0.41; 95 % CI 0.24-0.69] in developing countries.”
Quoted verbatim from Role of calcium supplementation during pregnancy in reducing risk of developing gestational hypertensive disorders: a meta-analysis of studies from developing countries.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- Pregnant women in developing countries; pooled analysis of randomised controlled trials
Effect 0.41 risk ratio, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.69
Role of calcium supplementation during pregnancy in reducing risk of developing gestational hypertensive disorders: a meta-analysis of studies from developing countries.2011PMID:21501435Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on Ca(2+)
- Every compound studied against Pre-eclampsia incidence
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M4QGV5H65RHQWEYX6YHY47GP