Ca(2+)/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
Decreases systolic blood pressure (setting unspecified)
Very limitedEvidence strength: very limited. Human evidence with major recorded weaknesses, or non-human, uncontrolled or unverified evidence.Finding“Combining all trials, participants receiving calcium supplementation as compared to control had a statistically significant reduction in SBP (mean difference: -2.5 mmHg, 95% CI: -4.5 to -0.6, I(2 )= 42%), but not DBP (mean difference: -0.8 mmHg, 95% CI: -2.1 to 0.4, I(2) = 48%).”
Quoted verbatim from Calcium supplementation for the management of primary hypertension in adults.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- Adults with primary hypertension (SBP 140 mmHg or above or DBP 85 mmHg or above); 13 randomised trials, 8 to 15 weeks follow-up
Effect -2.5 mean difference, 95% CI -4.5 to -0.6
Calcium supplementation for the management of primary hypertension in adults.2006PMID:16625609Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on Ca(2+)
- Every compound studied against Systolic blood pressure (setting unspecified)
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M4QGV4KHPV2WRHA00BQJSS9B