Ca(2+)/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
Decreases pre-eclampsia incidence
Very limitedEvidence strength: very limited. Human evidence with major recorded weaknesses, or non-human, uncontrolled or unverified evidence.Findingreplicated ×1“There was also a reduction in the risk of pre-eclampsia associated with calcium supplementation (13 trials, 15,730 women: average RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.65; I² = 70%; low-quality evidence).”
Quoted verbatim from Calcium supplementation during pregnancy for preventing hypertensive disorders and related problems.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Participants
- 15,730
- Dose
- at least 1 g/day calcium during pregnancy
- Population
- Pregnant women; high-dose calcium supplementation (at least 1 g daily) versus placebo, pooled RCTs
Effect 0.45 risk ratio, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.65
Calcium supplementation during pregnancy for preventing hypertensive disorders and related problems.2018PMID:30277579Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on Ca(2+)
- Every compound studied against Pre-eclampsia incidence
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M4QE3GRSWSY3MSW3WJWJSCDK