lycopene/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on serum prostate-specific antigen
Very limitedEvidence strength: very limited. Human evidence with major recorded weaknesses, or non-human, uncontrolled or unverified evidence.FindingNull result“Meta-analysis indicated no statistical difference in PSA levels between men randomised to receive lycopene and the comparison group (MD (mean difference) -0.34, 95% CI (confidence interval) -2.01, 1.32).”
Quoted verbatim from Lycopene for the prevention of prostate cancer.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- Men in a meta-analysis of randomised trials of lycopene for prostate cancer prevention; three RCTs with 154 participants overall, differing in design, participants and lycopene allocation
Effect -0.34 mean difference, 95% CI -2.01 to 1.32
Lycopene for the prevention of prostate cancer.2011PMID:22071840Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on lycopene
- Every compound studied against Serum prostate-specific antigen
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M45NZZYTM3E4D5F8WK1F4E7Q