methylene blue/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
Increases mean arterial pressure in vasodilatory shock
InsufficientEvidence strength: insufficient. Mechanistic inference, no evidence found, or evidence weakened below very limited.Finding“The MAP was significantly higher in the methylene blue-treated group starting 25 min after the amlodipine infusion (95% CI, 2–30) that was analyzed up until 60 minutes.”
Quoted verbatim from Efficacy of methylene blue in an experimental model of calcium channel blocker-induced shock.. - Study
- animal · not in humans
- Dose
- 2 mg/kg over 5 minutes at minutes 5, 30 and 60
- Population
- anaesthetised, ventilated Sprague-Dawley rats given an LD50 amlodipine infusion (17 mg/kg/hour) in both arms; MB or normal saline given at minutes 5, 30 and 60; MAP analysed from minute 25 to minute 60
Efficacy of methylene blue in an experimental model of calcium channel blocker-induced shock.2015PMID:25441767Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on methylene blue
- Every compound studied against Mean arterial pressure in vasodilatory shock
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M45CQXTFE7NWDZ8TNK2HVGDK