calciol/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on community-dwelling atrial fibrillation incidence
Very limitedEvidence strength: very limited. Human evidence with major recorded weaknesses, or non-human, uncontrolled or unverified evidence.FindingNull result“Among adults aged 50 years or older, treatment with EPA-DHA or vitamin D3, compared with placebo, resulted in no significant difference in the risk of incident AF over a median follow-up of more than 5 years.”
Quoted verbatim from Effect of Marine Omega-3 Fatty Acid and Vitamin D Supplementation on Incident Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.. - Study
- RCT
- Dose
- vitamin D3 2000 IU/d versus placebo, median 5.3 years of treatment and follow-up
- Population
- Community-dwelling US men and women aged 50 years or older without prior cardiovascular disease, cancer or atrial fibrillation; 2 x 2 factorial with marine omega-3 fatty acids, the omega-3 allocation balanced across the vitamin D3 and placebo comparison
Effect of Marine Omega-3 Fatty Acid and Vitamin D Supplementation on Incident Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.2021PMID:33724323Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on calciol
- Every compound studied against Community-dwelling atrial fibrillation incidence
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M458D5CG1CDAF74XT6WHZR9E