L-glutamine/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on all-cause mortality
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.FindingNull resultreplicated ×4“The pooled data indicated that enteral Gln did not decrease the overall mortality (RR = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.06 − 2.37; p = 0.300), with significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 61%).”
Quoted verbatim from Enteral glutamine supplements for patients with severe burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Participants
- 1,271
- Population
- Adults with severe burns (second- or third-degree burns over 20% or more TBSA, or 15% or more with inhalation injury) given enteral glutamine; primary endpoint; 3 pooled trials
Effect 0.37 risk ratio, 95% CI 0.06 to 2.37
Enteral glutamine supplements for patients with severe burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis.2024PMID:37460347Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on L-glutamine
- Every compound studied against All-cause mortality
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M0ZG9RV50RNYDR9JKAZN5ZCT