Papers/PMID:36164828
The effect of calcium supplementation in people under 35 years old: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
eLife2022The record
1 finding · 1 compound · 1 endpoint · 1 null
What it reported
How to read these marksEvery finding here is a null result.
What did not
1 finding
Ca(2+) — no detected effect on lumbar spine bone mineral density
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.FindingNull result“However, calcium supplementation did not improve the BMD levels at the lumbar spine (0.090, 95% CI: −0.044 to 0.224, p = 0.190) or total hip (0.257, 95% CI: −0.053 to 0.566, p = 0.104) or the BMC level at the total hip (0.116, 95% CI: −0.382 to 0.614, p = 0.648).”
Quoted verbatim from The effect of calcium supplementation in people under 35 years old: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- People aged 35 years or younger in randomised trials of calcium (dietary sources or supplements, some with vitamin D) versus placebo or no treatment, bone density by DXA
The effect of calcium supplementation in people under 35 years old: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.2022PMID:36164828Permalink