Ca(2+)/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
Decreases breast cancer incidence
Very limitedEvidence strength: very limited. Human evidence with major recorded weaknesses, or non-human, uncontrolled or unverified evidence.Finding“Overall, higher calcium intake was associated with a significantly lower risk of breast cancer (RR: 0.93; 95%CI: 0.90-0.96; p < 0.001; I2 = 35%).”
Quoted verbatim from Association Between Dietary/Supplementary Calcium Intake and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Dose
- highest versus lowest intake category
- Population
- Women in 14 prospective cohort studies (38 effect sizes), highest versus lowest calcium intake from diet and supplements combined
Effect 0.93 risk ratio, 95% CI 0.9 to 0.96
Association Between Dietary/Supplementary Calcium Intake and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.2026PMID:42141946Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on Ca(2+)
- Every compound studied against Breast cancer incidence
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M5RX7FNRP65W47GW99N97WZJ