selenium atom/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on urinary bladder cancer incidence
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.FindingNull resultreplicated ×1“The result showed that high selenium exposure was not associated with bladder cancer (pooled OR = 0.76, 95%CI: 0.58–1.01, as shown in Fig. 12) with moderate heterogeneity (Q = 25.06, P = 0.003; I 2 % = 64.1), but without publication bias (Begger’s test z c = 0.72; P = 0.474; Egger’s test t = −0.90, P = 0.395).”
Quoted verbatim from Selenium Exposure and Cancer Risk: an Updated Meta-analysis and Meta-regression.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- 10 estimates from 9 studies, highest versus lowest selenium exposure (exposure modes pooled)
Effect 0.76 odds ratio, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.01
Selenium Exposure and Cancer Risk: an Updated Meta-analysis and Meta-regression.2016PMID:26786590Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on selenium atom
- Every compound studied against Urinary bladder cancer incidence
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M5MW5BGV9T2TVTMG7MRD9SXK