selenium atom/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on urinary bladder cancer incidence
Very limitedEvidence strength: very limited. Human evidence with major recorded weaknesses, or non-human, uncontrolled or unverified evidence.FindingNull resultreplicated ×1“Two RCTs with 19,009 participants indicated that colorectal cancer was unaffected by selenium administration (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.43), as were non-melanoma skin cancer (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.30 to 4.42; 2 studies, 2027 participants), lung cancer (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.50; 2 studies, 19,009 participants), breast cancer (RR 2.04, 95% CI 0.44 to 9.55; 1 study, 802 participants), bladder cancer (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.52; 2 studies, 19,009 participants), and prostate cancer (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.14; 4 studies, 18,942 participants).”
Quoted verbatim from Selenium for preventing cancer.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- Adults in randomised trials of selenium supplements versus placebo; analysis of trials with low risk of bias
Effect 1.07 risk ratio, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.52
Selenium for preventing cancer.2018PMID:29376219Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on selenium atom
- Every compound studied against Urinary bladder cancer incidence
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M5MVJM4H1N60KHJ85ESTXGXV