Sesamum indicum/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on C-reactive protein concentration
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.FindingNull result“Sesame supplementation did not significantly influence the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α (SMD -0.421, 95% CI -1.199 to 0.356; I² = 74.716%, p = 0.047; Figure 10A), IL-6 (SMD -0.285, 95% CI -0.662 to 0.091; I² < 0.001%, p = 0.390; Figure 10B), or hs-CRP (SMD -0.203, 95% CI -0.487 to 0.080; I² < 0.001%, p = 0.984; Figure 10C).”
Quoted verbatim from Integrative Evidence on Sesame Supplementation for Cardiometabolic Risk Factors Relevant to Retinopathy.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- Adults with metabolic disorders in 10 pooled RCTs of sesame-based interventions versus placebo or control
Effect -0.203 standardised mean difference, 95% CI -0.487 to 0.08
Integrative Evidence on Sesame Supplementation for Cardiometabolic Risk Factors Relevant to Retinopathy.2026PMID:41799776Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on Sesamum indicum
- Every compound studied against C-reactive protein concentration
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M5MJKR3HAZEHS1DR08V58CEQ