Sesamum indicum/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on waist circumference
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.FindingNull result“Sesame supplementation showed no significant effects on body weight (SMD -0.111, 95% CI -0.384 to 0.162; I² < 0.001%, p = 0.837; Figure 6A), BMI (SMD -0.137, 95% CI -0.468 to 0.195; I² < 0.001%, p = 0.436; Figure 6B), body fat percentage (SMD -0.175, 95% CI -0.667 to 0.316; I² = 53.803%, p = 0.115; Figure 6C), waist circumference (SMD -0.054, 95% CI -0.396 to 0.288; I² = 5.879%, p = 0.346; Figure 7A), or hip circumference (SMD -0.096, 95% CI -0.427 to 0.235; I² < 0.001%, p = 0.538; Figure 7B).”
Quoted verbatim from Integrative Evidence on Sesame Supplementation for Cardiometabolic Risk Factors Relevant to Retinopathy.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- Adults with metabolic disorders in 10 pooled RCTs of sesame-based interventions versus placebo or control
Effect -0.054 standardised mean difference, 95% CI -0.396 to 0.288
Integrative Evidence on Sesame Supplementation for Cardiometabolic Risk Factors Relevant to Retinopathy.2026PMID:41799776Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on Sesamum indicum
- Every compound studied against Waist circumference
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M5MJKM8YKN6CSMCKBB8MHB2B