calciol/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on intensive care unit length of stay
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.FindingNull result“When the two cholecalciferol groups were combined into a single intervention arm and compared to the placebo group, there was no difference is ICU LOS: 12 (IQR 7 to 15) days for the placebo group versus 3 (IQR 3 to 12) days for the cholecalciferol group (p=0.77).”
Quoted verbatim from Effect of Cholecalciferol Supplementation on Vitamin D Status and Cathelicidin Levels in Sepsis: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.. - Study
- RCT
- Dose
- single bolus of 200,000 IU or 400,000 IU cholecalciferol (arms combined), versus matched placebo
- Population
- Adult ICU patients within 24 hours of new-onset severe sepsis or septic shock; post-hoc analysis combining the 200,000 IU and 400,000 IU cholecalciferol arms against placebo
Effect of Cholecalciferol Supplementation on Vitamin D Status and Cathelicidin Levels in Sepsis: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.2015PMID:26086941Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on calciol
- Every compound studied against Intensive care unit length of stay
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M5JT42ZXGF7YVAA9W103AJQM