K(+)/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
Decreases incidence of cardiovascular disease (composite)
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.Findingreplicated ×2“In addition, fully-adjusted model showed a lower risk of CVD for 56% in participants with the highest K intake in compared to lowest tertile (HR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.20–0.94) (Table 3).”
Quoted verbatim from Dietary sodium to potassium ratio is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events: a longitudinal follow-up study.. - Study
- cohort
- Dose
- habitual dietary potassium intake, highest tertile versus lowest tertile
- Population
- Iranian adults aged 30 years and over, free of CVD at baseline, Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study; dietary potassium by food frequency questionnaire, highest versus lowest tertile, fully adjusted model
Effect 0.44 hazard ratio, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.94
Dietary sodium to potassium ratio is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events: a longitudinal follow-up study.2023PMID:37072769Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on K(+)
- Every compound studied against Incidence of cardiovascular disease (composite)
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M5JQE9A3DKZATGG0Q6CW48VK