Ca(2+)/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on preterm birth incidence
Very limitedEvidence strength: very limited. Human evidence with major recorded weaknesses, or non-human, uncontrolled or unverified evidence.FindingNull result“There were no statistically significant differences between women who received calcium supplementation and those who did not in terms of reducing preterm births less than 37 weeks' gestation (risk ratio (RR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 1.05; 13 studies, 16,139 women; random-effects model) or less than 34 weeks' gestation (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.36; four trials, 5669).”
Quoted verbatim from Calcium supplementation (other than for preventing or treating hypertension) for improving pregnancy and infant outcomes.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Participants
- 16,139
- Population
- Pregnant women; pooled randomised trials of calcium supplementation versus placebo or no treatment, for purposes other than preventing or treating hypertension
Effect 0.86 risk ratio, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.05
Calcium supplementation (other than for preventing or treating hypertension) for improving pregnancy and infant outcomes.2015PMID:25922862Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on Ca(2+)
- Every compound studied against Preterm birth incidence
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M4QFMC40CTX3YM8KYQ6PKEP9