sodium(1+)/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on all-cause mortality
Very limitedEvidence strength: very limited. Human evidence with major recorded weaknesses, or non-human, uncontrolled or unverified evidence.FindingNull result“No linear association (effect size; 95 % CI; I 2) was seen between 100mg/d increment in Na intake and CVD mortality (1·01; 0·97, 1·05; 98·4 %) or all-cause mortality (1·01; 1·00, 1·02; 89·2 %).”
Quoted verbatim from Dose-response association of dietary sodium intake with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Dose
- 100 mg/day increment in Na intake (observational gradient)
- Population
- Adults in prospective cohort studies; dose-response of dietary sodium (Na) intake per 100 mg/day increment
Dose-response association of dietary sodium intake with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.2019PMID:30345950Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on sodium(1+)
- Every compound studied against All-cause mortality
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M4QAAWS65K0Z5BTK7N0YC3B2