N-acetyl-L-cysteine/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on all-cause mortality
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.FindingNull resultreplicated ×1“Meta-analytic estimates for in-hospital mortality showed that there was no statistically significant difference between patients treated with NAC and without, as shown in Supplemental Fig. 6 (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.43–1.68).”
Quoted verbatim from N-Acetylcysteine's Renoprotective Effect in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- Adults undergoing cardiac surgery, eight randomised trials pooled, NAC versus placebo; in-hospital mortality horizon
Effect 0.85 odds ratio, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.68
N-Acetylcysteine's Renoprotective Effect in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.2022PMID:34732600Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on N-acetyl-L-cysteine
- Every compound studied against All-cause mortality
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M4Q56G1SCFVGYDXE2S8KP6QF