L-glutamine/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on aspartate aminotransferase
InsufficientEvidence strength: insufficient. Mechanistic inference, no evidence found, or evidence weakened below very limited.FindingNull result“Likewise ALT and AST were not modified by glutamine supplementation (Table 3).”
Quoted verbatim from Long-term intermittent glutamine supplementation repairs intestinal damage (structure and functional mass) with advanced age: assessment with plasma citrulline in a rodent model.. - Study
- animal · not in humans
- Dose
- glutamine in drinking water 7 consecutive days a month for 10 months, 20% of dietary protein (about 0.8 g/rat/day)
- Population
- Very old (27-month) female Wistar rats given intermittent oral glutamine for 10 months versus water-only controls
Long-term intermittent glutamine supplementation repairs intestinal damage (structure and functional mass) with advanced age: assessment with plasma citrulline in a rodent model.2014PMID:25389959Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on L-glutamine
- Every compound studied against Aspartate aminotransferase
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M4Q1WNR2H5DMDX343J6TVRP6