calciol/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on hospital length of stay
Very limitedEvidence strength: very limited. Human evidence with major recorded weaknesses, or non-human, uncontrolled or unverified evidence.FindingNull result“Median (interquartile range) length of stay was not significantly different between the vitamin D3 (7.0 [4.0-10.0] days) and placebo groups (7.0 [5.0-13.0] days) (log-rank P = .59; unadjusted hazard ratio for hospital discharge, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.82-1.39]; P = .62).”
Quoted verbatim from Effect of a Single High Dose of Vitamin D3 on Hospital Length of Stay in Patients With Moderate to Severe COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.. - Study
- RCT
- Dose
- single oral dose of 200,000 IU vitamin D3 versus placebo
- Population
- Hospitalised adults with moderate to severe COVID-19 at two sites in Sao Paulo, Brazil
Effect 1.07 hazard ratio, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.39
Effect of a Single High Dose of Vitamin D3 on Hospital Length of Stay in Patients With Moderate to Severe COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.2021PMID:33595634Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on calciol
- Every compound studied against Hospital length of stay
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M458D3Z2YKA9QXD0M227ZD5B