L-glutamine/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the grade computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
Decreases wound infection incidence
PreliminaryGrade D, Preliminary. Human evidence with major recorded weaknesses, or non-human, uncontrolled or unverified evidence.Finding“Moreover, glutamine supplement reduced wound infection (risk ratios [RR] = 0.38, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.69, I2 = 0%, 3 trials), but not nonwound infection (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.05, I2 = 39.6%, 9 trials).”
Quoted verbatim from Glutamine Supplementation on Burn Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- Burn patients receiving glutamine supplementation (meta-analysis of 3 trials); route not stated.
Glutamine Supplementation on Burn Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.2024PMID:38243579Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on L-glutamine
- Every compound studied against Wound infection incidence
- How to read the grade and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M3R2J6V25GX1EEVN6FV7EE8Q