caffeine/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on countermovement jump height
LimitedEvidence strength: limited. Human evidence with several recorded weaknesses, or a design that tops out at limited.FindingNull resultreplicated ×1“CMJ performance was not improved by caffeine supplementation (WMD = 1.17, 95%CI: –0.02 to 2.36, p = 0.05).”
Quoted verbatim from Does ergogenic effect of caffeine supplementation depend on CYP1A2 genotypes? A systematic review with meta-analysis.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Dose
- Acute single dose, 2-6 mg/kg, ingested before the performance test
- Population
- Healthy young adults (active and sedentary), pooled across CYP1A2 genotypes; countermovement jump height in cm per the review Methods; secondary endpoint (the review primary outcome was CYP1A2 genotype)
Effect 1.17 mean difference, 95% CI -0.02 to 2.36
Does ergogenic effect of caffeine supplementation depend on CYP1A2 genotypes? A systematic review with meta-analysis.2024PMID:38158179Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on caffeine
- Every compound studied against Countermovement jump height
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M0PS76NG7ATKXMBRYSK18HMJ