caffeine/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on time to exhaustion
Very limitedEvidence strength: very limited. Human evidence with major recorded weaknesses, or non-human, uncontrolled or unverified evidence.FindingNull result“Time to exhaustion was not significantly influenced by CAF supplementation or menstrual cycle phase (p > 0.05).”
Quoted verbatim from Effects of Caffeine Supplementation on Cognitive Function and Neuromuscular Performance Across Menstrual Cycle Phases in Eumenorrheic Female Athletes: A Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Pilot Trial.. - Study
- RCT
- Participants
- 12
- Dose
- 400 mg caffeine ingested one hour before the testing session
- Population
- Trained eumenorrheic female athletes with regular menstrual cycles, tested in early follicular, late follicular and mid-luteal phases
Effects of Caffeine Supplementation on Cognitive Function and Neuromuscular Performance Across Menstrual Cycle Phases in Eumenorrheic Female Athletes: A Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Pilot Trial.2026PMID:42196972Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on caffeine
- Every compound studied against Time to exhaustion
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M094Q1QNT1TVQ23K6RK58H1N