Zn(2+)/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on hospital length of stay
Very limitedEvidence strength: very limited. Human evidence with major recorded weaknesses, or non-human, uncontrolled or unverified evidence.FindingNull resultreplicated ×1“Overall, compared with control intervention in neonatal sepsis, zinc supplementation is able to significantly reduce mortality rate (risk ratio (RR) = 0.48; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 0.25-0.94; p = .03) and improve serum zinc (mean difference (MD) = 81.97; 95% CI = 34.57-129.37; p = .0007), but has no remarkable influence on hospital stay (MD = -4.51; 95% CI = -15.08 to 6.05; p = .40) and the number of expired patients (RR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.24-1.65; p = .35).”
Quoted verbatim from Efficacy of zinc supplementation for neonatal sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- Neonates with sepsis; pooled randomised trials of zinc supplementation against a control intervention
Effect -4.51 mean difference, 95% CI -15.08 to 6.05
Efficacy of zinc supplementation for neonatal sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.2019PMID:29103346Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on Zn(2+)
- Every compound studied against Hospital length of stay
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M5SRPB5G8Z5Z6BSBFVNYMDMB