selenium atom/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on duration of mechanical ventilation
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.FindingNull result“When data from 5 trials about mechanical ventilation were included, selenium supplementation showed similar effect with placebo (SMD = 0.17, 95% CI: −0.30 to 0.63) using a random effect model (I2 = 80%, P =.0005) (Fig. S6).”
Quoted verbatim from A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: Efficacy of selenium treatment for sepsis.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- Patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, septic shock or SIRS in randomised trials of intravenous selenium versus placebo
Effect 0.17 standardised mean difference, 95% CI -0.3 to 0.63
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: Efficacy of selenium treatment for sepsis.2019PMID:30817625Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on selenium atom
- Every compound studied against Duration of mechanical ventilation
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M5MVJP15THPZEJGB09ARQJW8