Mn(2+)/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
Decreases type 2 diabetes incidence
Very limitedEvidence strength: very limited. Human evidence with major recorded weaknesses, or non-human, uncontrolled or unverified evidence.Finding“Compared with the lowest quintile of energy-adjusted dietary manganese, WHI-OS participants in the highest quintile had a 30% lower risk of type 2 diabetes (hazard ratio [HR] 0.70 [95% CI 0.65, 0.76]).”
Quoted verbatim from Dietary Manganese, Plasma Markers of Inflammation, and the Development of Type 2 Diabetes in Postmenopausal Women: Findings From the Women's Health Initiative.. - Study
- cohort
- Dose
- highest versus lowest quintile of energy-adjusted dietary manganese intake
- Population
- Postmenopausal women without a history of diabetes in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study; highest versus lowest quintile of energy-adjusted dietary manganese intake
Effect 0.7 hazard ratio, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.76
Dietary Manganese, Plasma Markers of Inflammation, and the Development of Type 2 Diabetes in Postmenopausal Women: Findings From the Women's Health Initiative.2020PMID:32295807Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on Mn(2+)
- Every compound studied against Type 2 diabetes incidence
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M5KFTEN6AN728X6D5BTWXEXR