caffeine/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on rating of perceived exertion
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.FindingNull resultreplicated ×10“Regarding the HR and the RPE, there were no significant differences between HRmean, HRmax or RPE and CAF/PLA during the whole study protocol.”
Quoted verbatim from The dose-dependent effect of caffeine supplementation on performance, reaction time and postural stability in CrossFit - a randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial.. - Study
- crossover
- Dose
- 3, 6 or 9 mg/kg body mass caffeine, single acute dose 70 min before the exercise test
- Population
- 26 moderately trained CrossFit practitioners (10 females, 16 males) with habitual moderate caffeine intake; all three caffeine doses compared with placebo; RPE rated on the Borg 6 to 20 scale after the Fight Gone Bad test
The dose-dependent effect of caffeine supplementation on performance, reaction time and postural stability in CrossFit - a randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial.2024PMID:38226646Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on caffeine
- Every compound studied against Rating of perceived exertion
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M5KDWVXWMJ0MGN9WTSFCG8S1