caffeine/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on rating of perceived exertion
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.FindingNull resultreplicated ×10“There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) between CAF and PLA conditions for RPE (3.0 ± 0.7 vs. 3.0 ± 0.9, p = 1.000, d = 0.00, Table 2) and balance (2.2 ± 0.6 vs. 1.8 ± 0.4, p = 0.162, d = 0.58, Table 2).”
Quoted verbatim from Caffeine Improves Sprint Time in Simulated Freestyle Swimming Competition but Not the Vertical Jump in Female Swimmers.. - Study
- crossover
- Dose
- 6 mg/kg CAF in capsules, single dose 60 min before testing
- Population
- 8 moderately trained female swimmers, RPE taken at the end of the tests; placebo was wheat bran capsules
Caffeine Improves Sprint Time in Simulated Freestyle Swimming Competition but Not the Vertical Jump in Female Swimmers.2024PMID:38732500Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on caffeine
- Every compound studied against Rating of perceived exertion
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M5KC7V9TYVZDHKPT4KKCXQCP