K(+)/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on flow-mediated dilation
Very limitedEvidence strength: very limited. Human evidence with major recorded weaknesses, or non-human, uncontrolled or unverified evidence.FindingNull result“Pooling results revealed a significant improvement in PP (SMD -0.280, 95% CI -0.493 to -0.067, p=0.010), but no improvement in PWV (SMD -0.342, 95% CI -1.123 to 0·440, p=0.391), AI (SMD -0.114, 95% CI -0.282 to 0.054, p=0.184), FMD (SMD 0·278, 95% CI -0.321 to 0.877, p=0.363), GTN (SMD -0.009, 95% CI -0.949 to 0.930, p=0.984), and ICAM-1 (SMD -0.238, 95% CI -0.720 to 0.244, p=0.333).”
Quoted verbatim from Effect of potassium supplementation on vascular function: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Dose
- 40 to 150 mmol/day across trials
- Population
- Participants in seven randomised trials of potassium supplementation (40 to 150 mmol/day, 6 days to 12 months)
Effect 0.278 standardised mean difference, 95% CI -0.321 to 0.877
Effect of potassium supplementation on vascular function: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.2017PMID:27865190Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on K(+)
- Every compound studied against Flow-mediated dilation
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M5JRWT4HGR2XCDWCJEZG866Z