Zn(2+)/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on type 2 diabetes incidence
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.FindingNull result“After pooling data from both studies, we found that total zinc intake was not significantly associated with the incidence of T2DM (OR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.82–1.11).”
Quoted verbatim from Zinc Intake and Status and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Dose
- total zinc intake (diet plus supplements), highest versus lowest quantile
- Population
- Adults free of diabetes at baseline in two large prospective cohorts (Swedish MDCS and American NHS); highest versus lowest total zinc intake from diet and supplements
Effect 0.95 odds ratio, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.11
Zinc Intake and Status and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.2019PMID:31071930Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on Zn(2+)
- Every compound studied against Type 2 diabetes incidence
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M5JD4S28NQWQA66K6CFHJ4RE