sodium(1+)/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
LimitedEvidence strength: limited. Human evidence with several recorded weaknesses, or a design that tops out at limited.FindingNull result“Average 24-hour urine sodium levels were not associated with conversion to clinically definite MS over the 5-year follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.67-1.24 per 1g increase in estimated daily sodium intake), nor were they associated with clinical or MRI outcomes (new active lesions after 6 months: HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.97-1.13; relative change in T2 lesion volume: -0.11, 95% CI = -0.25 to 0.04; change in EDSS: -0.01, 95% CI = -0.09 to 0.08; relapse rate: HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.56-1.07).”
Quoted verbatim from Sodium intake and multiple sclerosis activity and progression in BENEFIT.. - Study
- cohort
- Population
- 465 patients with a clinically isolated syndrome in the BENEFIT trial; exposure is estimated 24-hour urine sodium (Tanaka equations) from repeated spot urines, per 1 g increase, not an assigned dose
Sodium intake and multiple sclerosis activity and progression in BENEFIT.2017PMID:28556498Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on sodium(1+)
- Every compound studied against Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M4QE3EK9JCPMFRQDK9BA58K0