sucrose/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
Decreases type 2 diabetes incidence
Very limitedEvidence strength: very limited. Human evidence with major recorded weaknesses, or non-human, uncontrolled or unverified evidence.Finding“Although there was no association of total sugars (RR 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-1.09) or fructose (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.84-1.29) with type 2 diabetes, sucrose was associated with a decreased risk of type 2 diabetes (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80-0.98).”
Quoted verbatim from Relation of total sugars, fructose and sucrose with incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.. - Study
- cohort
- Population
- Adults in 15 prospective cohort studies (251 261 unique participants, 16 416 cases); highest versus lowest dietary sucrose intake; abstract only
Effect 0.89 risk ratio, 95% CI 0.8 to 0.98
Relation of total sugars, fructose and sucrose with incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.2017PMID:28536126Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on sucrose
- Every compound studied against Type 2 diabetes incidence
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M45CB9WE89GGVZ426RTF65FJ