caffeine/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on repeated-sprint performance decrement
InsufficientEvidence strength: insufficient. Mechanistic inference, no evidence found, or evidence weakened below very limited.FindingNull result“RSP, assessed by sprint performance decrement (%), did not differ (p = .209; effect size = 0.16; N = 18) between CAF (5.00 ± 2.84%) and PLA (5.43 ± 2.68%).”
Quoted verbatim from Acute Ingestion of Caffeinated Chewing Gum Improves Repeated Sprint Performance of Team Sport Athletes With Low Habitual Caffeine Consumption.. - Study
- crossover
- Participants
- 18
- Dose
- 200 mg caffeine via chewing gum, single dose
- Population
- male team sport athletes
Acute Ingestion of Caffeinated Chewing Gum Improves Repeated Sprint Performance of Team Sport Athletes With Low Habitual Caffeine Consumption.2018PMID:29091470Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on caffeine
- Every compound studied against Repeated-sprint performance decrement
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M31BCXRNEZZ7A6D34RYJ31RC