Camellia sinensis/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
Decreases bleeding on probing
Very limitedEvidence strength: very limited. Human evidence with major recorded weaknesses, or non-human, uncontrolled or unverified evidence.Finding“The subgroup meta-analysis showed that the green tea as sachet reduced probing bleeding (SMD = -0.71; 95%CI) and the gingival index (SMD = -0.78; 95%CI) compared to SRP with very low certainty of evidence.”
Quoted verbatim from Different applications forms of green tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze) for the treatment of periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- Patients with periodontitis; green tea sachet used as an adjunct to scaling and root planing, versus scaling and root planing alone (sachet application-form subgroup)
Effect -0.71 standardised mean difference
Different applications forms of green tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze) for the treatment of periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.2021PMID:33729563Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on Camellia sinensis
- Every compound studied against Bleeding on probing
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M1JGM36QYBV2YEAJVVBZCVDK