coenzyme Q10/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on intensive care unit length of stay
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.FindingNull result“ICU length of stay in the CoQ10 group (18.83 ± 10.72) was shorter than the placebo group (23.60 ± 10.03); however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.122).”
Quoted verbatim from Coenzyme Q10 supplementation in burn patients: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial.. - Study
- RCT
- Participants
- 52
- Duration
- 10 days
- Dose
- 100 mg three times a day after meals, total 300 mg/day
- Population
- Adults aged 18-65 with 20-60% total body surface area burns admitted to a burn ICU in Isfahan, Iran, all receiving routine burn care and the unit's standard vitamin, selenium, zinc and B-complex supplementation in both arms; secondary outcome.
Coenzyme Q10 supplementation in burn patients: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial.2024PMID:38431600Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on coenzyme Q10
- Every compound studied against Intensive care unit length of stay
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M10CXRPE5ZHZ8RBYXX4C8X7E