coenzyme Q10/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on total antioxidant capacity
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.FindingNull resultreplicated ×2“As shown in Table 2, the between-group comparison revealed no significant difference between CoQ10 and placebo groups at the end of the study for MDA (P = 0.692), SOD activity (P = 0.633), and TAC (P = 0.865).”
Quoted verbatim from Coenzyme Q10 supplementation in burn patients: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial.. - Study
- RCT
- Participants
- 52
- Duration
- 10 days
- Dose
- 100 mg three times a day after meals, total 300 mg/day
- Population
- Adults aged 18-65 with 20-60% total body surface area burns admitted to a burn ICU in Isfahan, Iran, all receiving routine burn care and the unit's standard vitamin, selenium, zinc and B-complex supplementation in both arms; primary outcome.
Coenzyme Q10 supplementation in burn patients: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial.2024PMID:38431600Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on coenzyme Q10
- Every compound studied against Total antioxidant capacity
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M10CXQ8BDKC872QH0WG6ZEE4