caffeine/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on rating of perceived exertion
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.FindingNull resultreplicated ×6“As shown in C, nine studies evaluated RPE after performing an exercise protocol after caffeine supplementation, finding no effect of this supplement on RPE (SMD: 0.258, 95% CI: −0.048, 0.565; I2 0.26% p = 0.260).”
Quoted verbatim from Does Acute Caffeine Supplementation Improve Physical Performance in Female Team-Sport Athletes? Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Dose
- Acute oral caffeine, doses across included studies 1.3-6 mg/kg, ingested 60 min before testing
- Population
- Adult female team-sport athletes; RPE recorded after an exercise protocol, pooled across nine studies
Effect 0.258 standardised mean difference, 95% CI -0.048 to 0.565
Does Acute Caffeine Supplementation Improve Physical Performance in Female Team-Sport Athletes? Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.2021PMID:34684665Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on caffeine
- Every compound studied against Rating of perceived exertion
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M0P8H7H20A38H9SCRWE60JHA