caffeine/Finding
One finding, on its own
A single claim from the graph, with the evidence strength computed from its study, the sentence it was drawn from, and the paper. This address does not change.
No detected effect on lower-body muscular strength (pooled composite)
ModerateEvidence strength: moderate. Human evidence with one recorded weakness, or capped at moderate by its design or by unread numbers.FindingNull resultreplicated ×1“In a subgroup analysis that considered only lower-body 1RM tests, there was no significant difference between caffeine and placebo (SMD: 0.16; 95% CI: −0.03, 0.35; p = 0.109; I2 = 0%).”
Quoted verbatim from Ergogenic Effects of Acute Caffeine Intake on Muscular Endurance and Muscular Strength in Women: A Meta-Analysis.. - Study
- meta-analysis
- Population
- Healthy adult women; subgroup analysis restricted to lower-body 1RM tests (squat, leg press, knee extension), not the overall estimate
Effect 0.16 standardised mean difference, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.35
Ergogenic Effects of Acute Caffeine Intake on Muscular Endurance and Muscular Strength in Women: A Meta-Analysis.2021PMID:34072182Permalink
Keep reading
- Everything the graph holds on caffeine
- Every compound studied against Lower-body muscular strength (pooled composite)
- How to read the evidence strength and the marks
To cite this finding: https://catalystproject.ai/e/01M0H4BEBYKN7X02J1TPJXWQQX