pterostilbeneWhat was measured
Measured, with no finding
165 endpoints
Show what was measuredHide what was measured
biochemical adverse drug reactions on liver, kidney and glucose markers, and self-reported adverse drug reactions versus placebo
no effect
Not recorded as a finding: the supporting sentence never names the compound
There were no statistically significant self-reported ADRs versus placebo (see Table 2).
PMID 23431291 · one of two readings recorded this
biochemical adverse drug reactions on liver, kidney and glucose markers
no effect
There was no biochemical ADRs on liver, kidney, or glucose markers
PMID 23431291 · one of two readings recorded this
blood urea nitrogen (BUN)
no effect, p = 0.2
but this reduction was not significant when compared to placebo (P = 0.20)
PMID 23431291 · one of two readings recorded this
blood urea nitrogen (BUN)
decreases, p = 0.01
The combination of grape extract and low-dose pterostilbene decreased BUN by 7.1% from baseline (P = 0.01)
PMID 23431291 · one of two readings recorded this
other electrolyte markers
no effect
There were no other significant effects on electrolyte markers
PMID 23431291 · one of two readings recorded this
patients lost to follow up
n = 60
Among the pterostilbene groups (n = 60), 2 patients were lost to follow up and 2 patients withdrew from the trial
PMID 23431291 · one of two readings recorded this
patients withdrawn from the trial
n = 60
Among the pterostilbene groups (n = 60), 2 patients were lost to follow up and 2 patients withdrew from the trial
PMID 23431291 · one of two readings recorded this
safety markers: ALT, AST, serum creatinine and blood glucose (biochemical adverse drug reactions), 6-8 weeks, pterostilbene 50 or 125 mg twice daily versus placebo
no effect
Not recorded as a finding: the supporting sentence never names the compound
There was no biochemical ADRs on liver, kidney, or glucose markers (See Figure 1).
PMID 23431291 · one of two readings recorded this
self-reported adverse drug reactions
no effect
There were no statistically significant self-reported ADRs versus placebo
PMID 23431291 · one of two readings recorded this
serum bicarbonate
decreases, p = 0.02
There was a significant 3.6% reduction in bicarbonate in the high-dose group versus placebo (P = 0.02) with a similar trend in both low-dose groups
PMID 23431291 · one of two readings recorded this
serum bicarbonate
decreases
There was a significant 3.6% reduction in bicarbonate in the high-dose group versus placebo (P = 0.02) with a similar trend in both low-dose groups
PMID 23431291 · one of two readings recorded this
serum bicarbonate
decreases
There was a significant 3.6% reduction in bicarbonate in the high-dose group versus placebo (P = 0.02) with a similar trend in both low-dose groups
PMID 23431291 · one of two readings recorded this
HDL cholesterol
no effect
Not recorded as a finding: The only sentences are agentless (no significant change in the primary analysis) or a subgroup (patients not on cholesterol medication, high dose); no compound-naming whole-population sentence
There was no significant change in HDL in the primary efficacy analysis.
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
HDL cholesterol
no effect
There was no significant change in HDL in the primary efficacy analysis
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
HDL cholesterol
decreases, p = 0.033
Subgroup analysis demonstrated a reduction of HDL with high dose pterostilbene monotherapy in patients not on cholesterol medication at baseline (−5.03 mg/dL; P = 0.033)
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
LDL cholesterol
no effect, p = 0.47
This increase was not significant in the GE combination group (P = 0.47)
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
LDL cholesterol
increases, p = 0.001
LDL increased with pterostilbene monotherapy (high dose and low dose groups combined) 17.1 mg/dL (P = 0.001), regardless of dose
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
LDL cholesterol
decreases
The presence of a baseline cholesterol medication appeared to attenuate this LDL increase in all groups
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
LDL cholesterol
increases
These findings were consistent regardless of baseline LDL ≤130 mg/dL versus >130 mg/dL
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
triglycerides
no effect
There was no significant change in triglycerides across all groups
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
appropriate statin use per 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines
no effect
appropriate statin use at baseline and final was 59% across all treatment arms
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
ASCVD risk score at baseline
no effect, p = 0.1
All treatment arms had similar ASCVD risk scores at baseline (P > 0.1 for all)
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
ASCVD risk score
no effect, p = 0.72
placebo: +0.59%, P = 0.33; high dose: +0.13%, P = 0.72; low dose: +0.02%, P = 0.96; GE combination: −0.83%, P = 0.11
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
ASCVD risk score
no effect, p = 0.96
placebo: +0.59%, P = 0.33; high dose: +0.13%, P = 0.72; low dose: +0.02%, P = 0.96; GE combination: −0.83%, P = 0.11
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
ASCVD risk score
no effect, p = 0.33
placebo: +0.59%, P = 0.33; high dose: +0.13%, P = 0.72; low dose: +0.02%, P = 0.96; GE combination: −0.83%, P = 0.11
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
ASCVD risk score
no effect, p = 0.11
placebo: +0.59%, P = 0.33; high dose: +0.13%, P = 0.72; low dose: +0.02%, P = 0.96; GE combination: −0.83%, P = 0.11
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
BMI
no effect
Not recorded as a finding: Agentless sentence that never names the compound; the BMI decrease is reported only in a subgroup not on cholesterol medication
There was no significant change in BMI in the primary efficacy analysis.
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
BMI
no effect
There was no significant change in BMI in the primary efficacy analysis
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
BMI
decreases
Subgroup analysis demonstrated a decrease in BMI with (1) low dose, (2) pterostilbene monotherapy, and (3) overall population (all 3 groups combined) in patients not on cholesterol medication at baseline
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
BMI
decreases
Subgroup analysis demonstrated a decrease in BMI with (1) low dose, (2) pterostilbene monotherapy, and (3) overall population (all 3 groups combined) in patients not on cholesterol medication at baseline
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
BMI
decreases
Subgroup analysis demonstrated a decrease in BMI with (1) low dose, (2) pterostilbene monotherapy, and (3) overall population (all 3 groups combined) in patients not on cholesterol medication at baseline
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
body mass index, primary efficacy analysis
no effect
Not recorded as a finding: Agentless sentence that never names the compound or the comparator.
There was no significant change in BMI in the primary efficacy analysis.
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
diastolic blood pressure
decreases
There was a significant reduction versus placebo in SBP and DBP with high dose pterostilbene (see Figure 2)
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
HDL cholesterol, primary efficacy analysis
no effect
Not recorded as a finding: Agentless sentence that never names the compound or the comparator.
There was no significant change in HDL in the primary efficacy analysis.
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
LDL cholesterol, fasting lipid panel (assay not stated)
increases, 17.1 mg/dL, p = 0.001
Not recorded as a finding: The sentence reports an increase with pooled monotherapy arms but never says versus placebo, so it may be a within-arm change; the ldl-cholesterol node needs a between-arm contrast.
LDL increased with pterostilbene monotherapy (high dose and low dose groups combined) 17.1 mg/dL (P = 0.001), regardless of dose (see Figure 2).
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
overall attrition rate
There was an 8.8% overall attrition rate
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
serum triglycerides, all groups
no effect
Not recorded as a finding: Agentless sentence that never names the compound or the comparator.
There was no significant change in triglycerides across all groups.
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
systolic blood pressure, grape-extract combination arm
decreases, -6.72 mmHg, p = 0.016
Not recorded as a finding: Combination arm (pterostilbene 50 mg plus grape extract) is absent from the comparator
A reduction in SBP was also seen in the GE combination group (−6.72 mmHg; P = 0.016).
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
systolic blood pressure
decreases
There was a significant reduction versus placebo in SBP and DBP with high dose pterostilbene (see Figure 2)
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
systolic blood pressure
decreases, p = 0.016
A reduction in SBP was also seen in the GE combination group (−6.72 mmHg; P = 0.016)
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
total cholesterol
increases
total cholesterol (TC) increased accordingly with both low dose and high dose pterostilbene
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
trial completion
The majority of patients completed the trial (91%) and demonstrated at least 80% compliance (81% of completers)
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
triglycerides, fasting serum
no effect
Not recorded as a finding: Agentless sentence that never names the compound
There was no significant change in triglycerides across all groups.
PMID 25057276 · one of two readings recorded this
superoxide dismutase
no effect, p = 0.83
Superoxide Dismutase (µg/ml) | 3.89 ± 0.43 | 2.99 ± 0.51* | 3.89 ± 0.42 | 2.96 ± 0.57* |.83
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
urea
no effect
Urea | 20.43 ± 4.66 | 21.56 ± 6.06 | 23.05 ± 5.17* | 21.57 ± 6.68 | 20.67 ± 1.00 | 22.71 ± 5.47 |.80
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
urea
no effect, p = 0.8
Urea | 20.43 ± 4.66 | 21.56 ± 6.06 | 23.05 ± 5.17* | 21.57 ± 6.68 | 20.67 ± 1.00 | 22.71 ± 5.47 |.80
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
bilirubin
no effect
Bilirubin | 0.70 ± 0.31 | 0.60 ± 0.20 | 0.60 ± 0.30 | 0.60 ± 0.25 | 0.70 ± 0.20 | 0.60 ± 0.21 |.72
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
bilirubin
no effect, p = 0.72
Bilirubin | 0.70 ± 0.31 | 0.60 ± 0.20 | 0.60 ± 0.30 | 0.60 ± 0.25 | 0.70 ± 0.20 | 0.60 ± 0.21 |.72
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
uric acid
no effect
Uric Acid | 4.64 ± 1.26 | 4.78 ± 1.26 | 4.62 ± 1.27 | 3.97 ± 0.95 | 4.06 ± 1.37 | 4.21 ± 1.41* |.24
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
uric acid
no effect, p = 0.24
Uric Acid | 4.64 ± 1.26 | 4.78 ± 1.26 | 4.62 ± 1.27 | 3.97 ± 0.95 | 4.06 ± 1.37 | 4.21 ± 1.41* |.24
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
chloride
no effect
Chloride | 104.86 ± 2.10 | 103.38 ± 2.43* | 102.34 ± 2.18* | 103.77 ± 2.01 | 102.57 ± 2.90* | 102.57 ± 1.85* |.66
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
chloride
no effect, p = 0.66
Chloride | 104.86 ± 2.10 | 103.38 ± 2.43* | 102.34 ± 2.18* | 103.77 ± 2.01 | 102.57 ± 2.90* | 102.57 ± 1.85* |.66
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
potassium
no effect
Potassium | 4.55 ± 0.82 | 4.93 ± 0.58* | 4.90 ± 0.59* | 4.46 ± 055 | 4.58 ± 0.55 | 4.77 ± 0.66 |.42
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
potassium
no effect, p = 0.42
Potassium | 4.55 ± 0.82 | 4.93 ± 0.58* | 4.90 ± 0.59* | 4.46 ± 055 | 4.58 ± 0.55 | 4.77 ± 0.66 |.42
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
hemoglobin
no effect
Hemoglobin | 13.99 ± 1.7 | 14.50 ± 1.93* | 14.44 ± 2.02* | 14.44 ± 2.27 | 14.62 ± 2.52 | 14.48 ± 2.21 |.94
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
hemoglobin
no effect, p = 0.94
Hemoglobin | 13.99 ± 1.7 | 14.50 ± 1.93* | 14.44 ± 2.02* | 14.44 ± 2.27 | 14.62 ± 2.52 | 14.48 ± 2.21 |.94
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
malondialdehyde
no effect, p = 0.17
Malondialdehyde (µM) | 0.42 ± 0.04 | 0.42 ± 0.06 | 0.42 ± 0.04 | 0.40 ± 0.05 |.17
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
eGFR
no effect
eGFR | 130.81 ± 24.54 | 123.15 ± 24.71 | 118.60 ± 19.21* | 124.06 ± 21.7 | 135.01 ± 28.42* | 124.56 ± 29.81 |.36
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
eGFR
no effect, p = 0.36
eGFR | 130.81 ± 24.54 | 123.15 ± 24.71 | 118.60 ± 19.21* | 124.06 ± 21.7 | 135.01 ± 28.42* | 124.56 ± 29.81 |.36
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
GGT
no effect
GGT | 24.18 ± 8.13 | 23.00 ± 9.96 | 23.82 ± 9.63 | 25.50 ± 8.44 | 22.88 ± 8.00 | 22.6 ± 9.51 |.63
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
GGT
no effect, p = 0.63
GGT | 24.18 ± 8.13 | 23.00 ± 9.96 | 23.82 ± 9.63 | 25.50 ± 8.44 | 22.88 ± 8.00 | 22.6 ± 9.51 |.63
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
AST
no effect
AST | 27.46 ± 7.14 | 26.74 ± 5.79 | 26.26 ± 5.46 | 25.21 ± 7.43 | 24.91 ± 3.60 | 27.53 ± 8.55 |.49
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
AST
no effect, p = 0.49
AST | 27.46 ± 7.14 | 26.74 ± 5.79 | 26.26 ± 5.46 | 25.21 ± 7.43 | 24.91 ± 3.60 | 27.53 ± 8.55 |.49
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
ALP
no effect
ALP | 80.52 ± 17.13 | 80.72 ± 19.58 | 80.48 ± 13.85 | 82.13 ± 22.43 | 85.33 ± 29.13 | 85.47 ± 25.52 |.36
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
ALP
no effect, p = 0.36
ALP | 80.52 ± 17.13 | 80.72 ± 19.58 | 80.48 ± 13.85 | 82.13 ± 22.43 | 85.33 ± 29.13 | 85.47 ± 25.52 |.36
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
ALT
no effect
ALT | 25.52 ± 14.98 | 25.17 ± 16.57 | 22.46 ± 9.80 | 19.63 ± 7.41 | 20.78 ± 7.25 | 19.98 ± 11.89 |.39
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
ALT
no effect, p = 0.39
ALT | 25.52 ± 14.98 | 25.17 ± 16.57 | 22.46 ± 9.80 | 19.63 ± 7.41 | 20.78 ± 7.25 | 19.98 ± 11.89 |.39
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
basophils
no effect
Basophils | 0.75 ± 0.31 | 0.87 ± 0.41 | 1.21 ± 0.56* | 0.85 ± 0.42 | 0.92 ± 0.34 | 1.41 ± 0.53* |.16
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
basophils
no effect, p = 0.16
Basophils | 0.75 ± 0.31 | 0.87 ± 0.41 | 1.21 ± 0.56* | 0.85 ± 0.42 | 0.92 ± 0.34 | 1.41 ± 0.53* |.16
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
blood glutathione, potassium phosphate-EDTA method
increases, mean change 14.41 nM/mL in PME arm (11.3% from baseline)
Not recorded as a finding: Sentence says the PME change was comparatively higher but gives no between-group test; Table 5 between-group P is .42, so neither direction is recordable.
The mean change from baseline to final visit in the PME arm was 14.41 (increase of 11.3% from baseline), comparatively higher than in the placebo arm.
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
blood urea, reported as urea not urea nitrogen
no effect
Not recorded as a finding: blood-urea-nitrogen node requires the nitrogen scale; the paper reports urea.
Renal function parameters like urea, uric acid, creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, sodium, potassium, and chloride levels were comparable between placebo and PME at all time points (Table 4 and Table S5, S6).
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
BMI
no effect
At the end of the study, both groups showed no significant change in body weight, BMI, blood pressure, body temperature, pulse rate, and respiratory rate
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
body temperature
no effect
Temperature (oF) | 98.36 ± 0.61 (96.98, 99.14) | 98.36 ± 0.78 (96.80, 99.42) | 98.15 ± 0.84 (96.84, 99.42) | 98.39 ± 0.51 (97.39, 98.90) | 98.34 ± 0.64 (97.10, 99.04) | 98.43 ± 0.72 (96.94, 99.47) |.17
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
body temperature
no effect, p = 0.17
Temperature (oF) | 98.36 ± 0.61 (96.98, 99.14) | 98.36 ± 0.78 (96.80, 99.42) | 98.15 ± 0.84 (96.84, 99.42) | 98.39 ± 0.51 (97.39, 98.90) | 98.34 ± 0.64 (97.10, 99.04) | 98.43 ± 0.72 (96.94, 99.47) |.17
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
body weight, BMI, blood pressure, pulse rate, body temperature, respiratory rate
no effect
Not recorded as a finding: The sentence is a within-group statement with no compound named and no between-arm contrast; the between-group P values appear only in Table 2
At the end of the study, both groups showed no significant change in body weight, BMI, blood pressure, body temperature, pulse rate, and respiratory rate (Table 2) and no change was observed after 30 days of supplementation (Table S1, S2).
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
body weight
no effect
At the end of the study, both groups showed no significant change in body weight, BMI, blood pressure, body temperature, pulse rate, and respiratory rate
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
diastolic blood pressure
no effect
DBP (mm Hg) | 77.21 ± 3.60 (70.0, 80.0) | 77.01 ± 4.40 (70.0, 83.2) | 76.54 ± 4.91 (68.8, 82.0) | 78.34 ± 3.45 (70.0, 83.1) | 77.41 ± 4.12 (70.0, 82.2) | 75.61 ± 5.05 (70.0, 83.10) |.47
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
diastolic blood pressure
no effect, p = 0.47
DBP (mm Hg) | 77.21 ± 3.60 (70.0, 80.0) | 77.01 ± 4.40 (70.0, 83.2) | 76.54 ± 4.91 (68.8, 82.0) | 78.34 ± 3.45 (70.0, 83.1) | 77.41 ± 4.12 (70.0, 82.2) | 75.61 ± 5.05 (70.0, 83.10) |.47
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
ECG abnormal, clinically significant (CS)
no effect
Abnormal (CS) | 0 (0.00%) | 0 (0.00%) | 0 (0.00%) | 0 (0.00%)
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
ECG abnormal, not clinically significant (NCS)
no effect
Abnormal (NCS) | 0 (0.00%) | 1 (3.45%) | 1 (3.33%) | 2 (6.67%)
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
ECG normal participants
no effect
ECG Normal | 29 (100.00%) | 28 (97.55%) | 29 (96.67%) | 28 (93.33%)
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
eGFR, estimating equation not stated
no effect
Not recorded as a finding: egfr node requires a stated estimating equation; the paper names none.
Renal function parameters like urea, uric acid, creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, sodium, potassium, and chloride levels were comparable between placebo and PME at all time points (Table 4 and Table S5, S6).
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
eosinophils
no effect
Eosinophils | 5.51 ± 3.74 | 5.06 ± 2.71 | 5.60 ± 2.45 | 4.46 ± 2.26 | 5.78 ± 3.72* | 5.15 ± 2.92 |.52
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
eosinophils
no effect, p = 0.52
Eosinophils | 5.51 ± 3.74 | 5.06 ± 2.71 | 5.60 ± 2.45 | 4.46 ± 2.26 | 5.78 ± 3.72* | 5.15 ± 2.92 |.52
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
erythrocyte count
no effect
Erythrocyte | 5.13 ± 0.53 | 5.22 ± 0.57* | 5.19 ± 0.54 | 5.18 ± 0.59 | 5.19 ± 0.63 | 5.17 ± 0.61 |.89
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
erythrocyte count
no effect, p = 0.89
Erythrocyte | 5.13 ± 0.53 | 5.22 ± 0.57* | 5.19 ± 0.54 | 5.18 ± 0.59 | 5.19 ± 0.63 | 5.17 ± 0.61 |.89
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
fasting blood sugar (median at end of study)
no effect
Fasting blood sugar was 87 [72.20 to 132.20] mg/dL in PME and 86 [70.90 to 106.65] mg dl−1 at the end of the study
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
fasting blood sugar
no effect, p = 0.26
FBS | 83.31 ± 5.59 | 89.58 ± 14.13 | 81.84 ± 7.64 | 86.04 ± 9.55 |.26
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
glutathione mean change from baseline to final visit
increases
The mean change from baseline to final visit in the PME arm was 14.41 (increase of 11.3% from baseline), comparatively higher than in the placebo arm
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
glutathione
no effect, p = 0.42
Glutathione (nM/ml) | 128.25 ± 28.32 | 142.28 ± 39.46 | 132.46 ± 25.55 | 134.45 ± 34.42 |.42
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
glycosylated haemoglobin and fasting blood sugar
no effect
Not recorded as a finding: Sentence is agentless about the arm contrast and gives per-group medians; no two-sided between-arm statement anchors it
Similarly, no significant change was observed in glycosylated hemoglobin percentages 5.50 [5.00 to 6.08] g% and 5.50 [5.00 to 5.90] g% for PME and placebo, respectively.
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
glycosylated haemoglobin, method not stated
no effect, 5.50 g% PME and 5.50 g% placebo, medians
Not recorded as a finding: Agentless no-change sentence that may be within-arm; it gives the two arms' medians but no between-group statement.
Similarly, no significant change was observed in glycosylated hemoglobin percentages 5.50 [5.00 to 6.08] g% and 5.50 [5.00 to 5.90] g% for PME and placebo, respectively.
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c, median at end of study)
no effect
no significant change was observed in glycosylated hemoglobin percentages 5.50 [5.00 to 6.08] g% and 5.50 [5.00 to 5.90] g% for PME and placebo, respectively
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c)
no effect, p = 0.64
Hb1AC | 5.39 ± 0.26 | 5.46 ± 0.34 | 5.44 ± 0.40 | 5.50 ± 0.32 |.64
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
HDL cholesterol (median)
no effect
HDL | 41(34.5, 47.5) | 38(33, 42.5) | 35(32.5, 45) | 41(35,49) | 36(32, 46.5) | 40(30.5, 46) |.95
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
HDL cholesterol (median)
no effect, p = 0.95
HDL | 41(34.5, 47.5) | 38(33, 42.5) | 35(32.5, 45) | 41(35,49) | 36(32, 46.5) | 40(30.5, 46) |.95
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
hematological parameters (relative change screening to final)
no effect
relative change from screening to final visit between PME and placebo group was not statistically significant
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
LDL cholesterol (median)
no effect
LDL-C | 112 (96.3,133.3) | 120.2 (102.1, 37.3) | 98.2 (84.8, 126.8) * | 109.3 (95.8, 121.3) | 103.1 (79.3, 120.3) | 106.2 (86.8, 115.9) |.21
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
LDL cholesterol (median)
no effect, p = 0.21
LDL-C | 112 (96.3,133.3) | 120.2 (102.1, 37.3) | 98.2 (84.8, 126.8) * | 109.3 (95.8, 121.3) | 103.1 (79.3, 120.3) | 106.2 (86.8, 115.9) |.21
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
leukocyte count
no effect
Leukocyte | 7.13 ± 1.43 | 7.60 ± 1.66 | 7.92 ± 1.80 | 7.54 ± 1.64 | 7.48 ± 1.87 | 7.95 ± 1.89 |.95
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
leukocyte count
no effect, p = 0.95
Leukocyte | 7.13 ± 1.43 | 7.60 ± 1.66 | 7.92 ± 1.80 | 7.54 ± 1.64 | 7.48 ± 1.87 | 7.95 ± 1.89 |.95
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
lipid profile (TC, TG, LDL-C, HDL-C, VLDL-C), serum, assay not stated
no effect
Not recorded as a finding: The only between-arm sentence does not name any lipid, so no object span anchors a node
No statistically significant differences were observed between the PME and placebo groups (Table 4 and Table S4).
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
lymphocytes
no effect
Lymphocytes | 35.54 ± 7.26 | 36.56 ± 6.84 | 36.96 ± 5.57 | 32.52 ± 7.53 | 35.99 ± 7.97 | 34.04 ± 7.46 |.09
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
lymphocytes
no effect, p = 0.09
Lymphocytes | 35.54 ± 7.26 | 36.56 ± 6.84 | 36.96 ± 5.57 | 32.52 ± 7.53 | 35.99 ± 7.97 | 34.04 ± 7.46 |.09
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
malondialdehyde, lipid peroxidation method
no effect
Not recorded as a finding: Sentence is a within-arm statement against baseline in both groups, not a between-arm contrast.
Malondialdehyde remained unchanged at the final visit compared to baseline values in both the PME and placebo groups.
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC)
no effect
MCHC | 33.04 ± 0.99 | 33.39 ± 1.01 | 33.52 ± 0.83 | 33.15 ± 1.16 | 33.47 ± 1.29 | 33.46 ± 1.02 |.80
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC)
no effect, p = 0.8
MCHC | 33.04 ± 0.99 | 33.39 ± 1.01 | 33.52 ± 0.83 | 33.15 ± 1.16 | 33.47 ± 1.29 | 33.46 ± 1.02 |.80
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH)
no effect
MCH | 27.27 ± 2.95 | 27.71 ± 2.25 | 27.98 ± 1.58 | 27.84 ± 2.97 | 28.22 ± 3.04 | 27.95 ± 2.28 |.95
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH)
no effect, p = 0.95
MCH | 27.27 ± 2.95 | 27.71 ± 2.25 | 27.98 ± 1.58 | 27.84 ± 2.97 | 28.22 ± 3.04 | 27.95 ± 2.28 |.95
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
mean corpuscular volume (MCV)
no effect
MCV | 82.81 ± 7.06 | 82.53 ± 5.50 | 82.97 ± 4.21 | 83.61 ± 5.81 | 83.80 ± 6.76 | 83.35 ± 5.74 |.77
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
mean corpuscular volume (MCV)
no effect, p = 0.77
MCV | 82.81 ± 7.06 | 82.53 ± 5.50 | 82.97 ± 4.21 | 83.61 ± 5.81 | 83.80 ± 6.76 | 83.35 ± 5.74 |.77
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
mean platelet volume (MPV)
no effect
MPV | 10.56 ± 0.92 | 10.62 ± 0.85 | 10.52 ± 1.07 | 10.68 ± 0.65 | 10.74 ± 0.76 | 10.97 ± 0.65 |.06
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
mean platelet volume (MPV)
no effect, p = 0.06
MPV | 10.56 ± 0.92 | 10.62 ± 0.85 | 10.52 ± 1.07 | 10.68 ± 0.65 | 10.74 ± 0.76 | 10.97 ± 0.65 |.06
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
monocytes
no effect
Monocytes | 8.01 ± 1.59 | 7.71 ± 2.14 | 7.48 ± 1.32 | 7.88 ± 1.87 | 7.42 ± 1.68 | 7.38 ± 1.87 |.94
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
monocytes
no effect, p = 0.94
Monocytes | 8.01 ± 1.59 | 7.71 ± 2.14 | 7.48 ± 1.32 | 7.88 ± 1.87 | 7.42 ± 1.68 | 7.38 ± 1.87 |.94
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
neutrophils
no effect
Neutrophils | 49.99 ± 9.95 | 49.68 ± 8.74 | 49.07 ± 5.74 | 54.07 ± 8.68 | 49.63 ± 10.2* | 51.14 ± 7.98* |.26
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
neutrophils
no effect, p = 0.26
Neutrophils | 49.99 ± 9.95 | 49.68 ± 8.74 | 49.07 ± 5.74 | 54.07 ± 8.68 | 49.63 ± 10.2* | 51.14 ± 7.98* |.26
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
packed cell volume (PCV)
no effect
PCV | 42.40 ± 5.08 | 43.04 ± 5.67 | 42.93 ± 5.64 | 43.42 ± 5.92 | 43.50 ± 6.37 | 43.14 ± 6.25 |.89
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
packed cell volume (PCV)
no effect, p = 0.89
PCV | 42.40 ± 5.08 | 43.04 ± 5.67 | 42.93 ± 5.64 | 43.42 ± 5.92 | 43.50 ± 6.37 | 43.14 ± 6.25 |.89
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
platelet count
no effect
Platelet | 291.53 ± 57.0 | 307.86 ± 63.3 | 294.03 ± 75.7 | 278.38 ± 57.6 | 284.82 ± 55.3 | 285.50 ± 58.3 |.62
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
platelet count
no effect, p = 0.62
Platelet | 291.53 ± 57.0 | 307.86 ± 63.3 | 294.03 ± 75.7 | 278.38 ± 57.6 | 284.82 ± 55.3 | 285.50 ± 58.3 |.62
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
pulse rate
no effect
Pulse Rate (beats/min) | 76.62 ± 5.10 (68.00, 89.00) | 76.97 ± 5.08 (72.00, 88.00) | 76.24 ± 4.74 (66.00, 84.00) | 75.27 ± 4.37 (68.00, 85.00) | 76.87 ± 4.52 (68.00, 88.00) | 76.53 ± 4.17 (72.00, 84.00) |.80
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
pulse rate
no effect, p = 0.8
Pulse Rate (beats/min) | 76.62 ± 5.10 (68.00, 89.00) | 76.97 ± 5.08 (72.00, 88.00) | 76.24 ± 4.74 (66.00, 84.00) | 75.27 ± 4.37 (68.00, 85.00) | 76.87 ± 4.52 (68.00, 88.00) | 76.53 ± 4.17 (72.00, 84.00) |.80
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
respiratory rate
no effect
Respiratory Rate/ min) | 16.03 ± 1.96 (12.40, 18.00) | 17.37 ± 1.32 (15.40, 20.00) | 16.99 ± 1.10 (14.80, 18.00) | 15.6 ± 1.98 (12.00, 18.00) | 17.31 ± 1.07 (16.00, 19.10) | 17.03 ± 1.00 (16.00, 18.00) |.88
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
respiratory rate
no effect, p = 0.88
Respiratory Rate/ min) | 16.03 ± 1.96 (12.40, 18.00) | 17.37 ± 1.32 (15.40, 20.00) | 16.99 ± 1.10 (14.80, 18.00) | 15.6 ± 1.98 (12.00, 18.00) | 17.31 ± 1.07 (16.00, 19.10) | 17.03 ± 1.00 (16.00, 18.00) |.88
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
serum creatinine
no effect
S Cr | 0.68 ± 0.16 | 0.71 ± 0.16 | 0.72 ± 0.16 | 0.69 ± 0.11 | 0.66 ± 0.13* | 0.69 ± 0.13 |.44
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
serum creatinine
no effect, p = 0.44
S Cr | 0.68 ± 0.16 | 0.71 ± 0.16 | 0.72 ± 0.16 | 0.69 ± 0.11 | 0.66 ± 0.13* | 0.69 ± 0.13 |.44
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
sodium
no effect
Sodium | 140.28 ± 1.73 | 139.59 ± 2.58 | 138.07 ± 2.56* | 140.10 ± 1.54 | 139.20 ± 3.04 | 138.30 ± 2.65* |.73
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
sodium
no effect, p = 0.73
Sodium | 140.28 ± 1.73 | 139.59 ± 2.58 | 138.07 ± 2.56* | 140.10 ± 1.54 | 139.20 ± 3.04 | 138.30 ± 2.65* |.73
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
systolic blood pressure
no effect
SBP (mm Hg) | 117.48 ± 5.01 (110.0, 125.0) | 118.57 ± 4.62 (110.0, 125.2) | 118.88 ± 4.18 (110.8, 124.0) | 117.68 ± 3.96 (110.0, 124.2) | 118.23 ± 4.02 (110.0, 124.0) | 117.33 ± 4.96 (110.0, 124.0) |.20
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
systolic blood pressure
no effect, p = 0.2
SBP (mm Hg) | 117.48 ± 5.01 (110.0, 125.0) | 118.57 ± 4.62 (110.0, 125.2) | 118.88 ± 4.18 (110.8, 124.0) | 117.68 ± 3.96 (110.0, 124.2) | 118.23 ± 4.02 (110.0, 124.0) | 117.33 ± 4.96 (110.0, 124.0) |.20
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
T3 at final visit (group not stated)
T3, T4 and TSH at the final visit were 1.44 ± 0.2(ng/mL), 9.20 ± 2.23(μg/dL), and 2.62 ± 1.37(μIU/mL), respectively
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
T3 at screening visit (group not stated)
The mean serum-triiodothyronine (T3), serum-tera-iodothyronine (T4), and serum-thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) were 1.40 ± 0.18(μg/dL), 8.49 ± 1.98(μg/dL), and 3.02 ± 2.19(μIU/ mL), respectively, at the screening visit
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
T3
no effect
T3 | 1.41 ± 0.18 | 1.36 ± 0.21 | 1.45 ± 0.2 | 1.44 ± 0.14 | 1.39 ± 0.21* | 1.46 ± 0.2 | 1.00
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
T3
no effect, p = 1
T3 | 1.41 ± 0.18 | 1.36 ± 0.21 | 1.45 ± 0.2 | 1.44 ± 0.14 | 1.39 ± 0.21* | 1.46 ± 0.2 | 1.00
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
T4 at final visit (group not stated)
T3, T4 and TSH at the final visit were 1.44 ± 0.2(ng/mL), 9.20 ± 2.23(μg/dL), and 2.62 ± 1.37(μIU/mL), respectively
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
T4 at screening visit (group not stated)
The mean serum-triiodothyronine (T3), serum-tera-iodothyronine (T4), and serum-thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) were 1.40 ± 0.18(μg/dL), 8.49 ± 1.98(μg/dL), and 3.02 ± 2.19(μIU/ mL), respectively, at the screening visit
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
T4
no effect
T4 | 8.40 ± 1.98 | 8.93 ± 2.39 | 9.10 ± 2.23 | 8.31 ± 1.92 | 8.68 ± 1.90 | 8.77 ± 1.87 |.51
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
T4
no effect, p = 0.51
T4 | 8.40 ± 1.98 | 8.93 ± 2.39 | 9.10 ± 2.23 | 8.31 ± 1.92 | 8.68 ± 1.90 | 8.77 ± 1.87 |.51
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
thyroid function panel (T3, T4, TSH), immunoassay not stated
no effect
Not recorded as a finding: Sentence names a panel, not TSH or free T4 or free T3 individually; total T3 and T4 have no node and the FT4 and FT3 nodes need free fractions.
No statistically significant changes were observed in the thyroid function test outcomes for the PME group compared to the placebo at all time points (Table 4 and Table S7).
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
thyroid function tests: total T3, total T4 in ug/dL, TSH
no effect
Not recorded as a finding: Sentence names only 'thyroid function test outcomes', not an individual analyte; T3 and T4 here are total hormone, not the free-hormone nodes
No statistically significant changes were observed in the thyroid function test outcomes for the PME group compared to the placebo at all time points (Table 4 and Table S7).
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
total cholesterol (median)
no effect
TC | 179 (132, 238) | 188 (124, 255) | 175 (99, 229) | 170.5 (152, 192) | 158.5 (143, 188.5) | 160.5 (148, 183.5) |.47
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
total cholesterol (median)
no effect, p = 0.47
TC | 179 (132, 238) | 188 (124, 255) | 175 (99, 229) | 170.5 (152, 192) | 158.5 (143, 188.5) | 160.5 (148, 183.5) |.47
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
triglycerides (median)
no effect
TG | 113 (76, 141.5) | 127 (88, 202.5) ** | 125(88.5, 211.5) *** | 117(84, 151) | 132.5(85.5, 201) * | 143 (115.5,208.5) *** |.86
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
triglycerides (median)
no effect, p = 0.86
TG | 113 (76, 141.5) | 127 (88, 202.5) ** | 125(88.5, 211.5) *** | 117(84, 151) | 132.5(85.5, 201) * | 143 (115.5,208.5) *** |.86
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
TSH at final visit (group not stated)
T3, T4 and TSH at the final visit were 1.44 ± 0.2(ng/mL), 9.20 ± 2.23(μg/dL), and 2.62 ± 1.37(μIU/mL), respectively
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
TSH at screening visit (group not stated)
The mean serum-triiodothyronine (T3), serum-tera-iodothyronine (T4), and serum-thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) were 1.40 ± 0.18(μg/dL), 8.49 ± 1.98(μg/dL), and 3.02 ± 2.19(μIU/ mL), respectively, at the screening visit
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
TSH
no effect
TSH | 2.34 ± 2.19 | 2.42 ± 1.48 | 2.51 ± 1.37 | 2.50 ± 1.26 | 2.20 ± 1.44 | 2.64 ± 1.52 |.61
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
TSH
no effect, p = 0.61
TSH | 2.34 ± 2.19 | 2.42 ± 1.48 | 2.51 ± 1.37 | 2.50 ± 1.26 | 2.20 ± 1.44 | 2.64 ± 1.52 |.61
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
VLDL cholesterol (median)
no effect
VLDL | 22.6 (15.2, 28.3) | 25.4 (17.6,40.5) ** | 25 (17.7, 42.3) *** | 23.4 (16.8, 30.2) | 26.5 (17.1, 40.2) * | 28.6 (22.3,41.7) *** |.86
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
VLDL cholesterol (median)
no effect, p = 0.86
VLDL | 22.6 (15.2, 28.3) | 25.4 (17.6,40.5) ** | 25 (17.7, 42.3) *** | 23.4 (16.8, 30.2) | 26.5 (17.1, 40.2) * | 28.6 (22.3,41.7) *** |.86
PMID 37671486 · one of two readings recorded this
blood miR-193b expression level
increases
In the analysis of blood miRNA expression levels, miR-34a and miR-193b showed very high increases at week 4 and after week 4 of intake, respectively
PMID 40024751 · one of two readings recorded this
blood miR-34a expression level
increases
In the analysis of blood miRNA expression levels, miR-34a and miR-193b showed very high increases at week 4 and after week 4 of intake, respectively
PMID 40024751 · one of two readings recorded this
Hallmark pathway, interferon-alpha response (GSEA)
increases
The most significant molecular changes affected by the addition of PT was the activation of the interferon-alpha response pathway
PMID 40227411 · one of two readings recorded this
Hallmark pathways, oxidative phosphorylation, glycolysis, hypoxia and mTOR signaling (GSEA)
decreases
The comparison of GSEA in MA-treated tumors to PT+MA-treated tumors demonstrated pathways suppressed by PT, and included important pathways central to tumor progression, including oxidative phosphorylation, glycolysis, hypoxia, and mTOR signaling
PMID 40227411 · one of two readings recorded this
Histological response (GOG-211), endometrial patients only
no effect
A subset of endometrial patients only (Arm 1, n = 14 and Arm 2, n = 14) did not reveal any differences between arms
PMID 40227411 · one of two readings recorded this
Histological response (GOG-211)
no effect
Histological response was high in both arms (>90%), likely contributing to lack of statistical significance between arms
PMID 40227411 · one of two readings recorded this
IHC biomarkers of response (CDK4, Cyclin D1, BCL2, p-STAT3, p-ERK1/2, ER, PR)
no effect
The results showed no significant differences between Arm 1 (n = 19) and Arm 2 (n = 18)
PMID 40227411 · one of two readings recorded this
Ki-67 index, global score, percent change
no effect, p = 0.25, n = 29
The global score for endometrioid patients was -38.0% and MA score −28.2%; p = 0.25 [(post−pre)/pre]
PMID 40227411 · one of two readings recorded this
Ki-67 index, hot spot score, percent change
no effect, p = 0.14, n = 29
The endometrioid PT+MA group demonstrated a larger decrease in Ki-67 with a -33.8% change compared to −20.1% in the MA group, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.14, one-sided)
PMID 40227411 · one of two readings recorded this
Ki-67 index, hot spot score, pre- vs post-treatment standard deviations
no effect
The hot spot score for Ki-67 analysis showed standard deviations were not significantly different between pre-treatment and post-treatment values
PMID 40227411 · one of two readings recorded this
Ki-67 proliferation index by immunohistochemistry (MIB-1, hot spot score), pre- vs post-treatment hysterectomy specimen, primary endpoint; also histological response by GOG-211 criteria, IHC biomarkers, tumour transcriptome, and lipid panel (HDL, LDL, triglycerides), glucose, weight, BMI
-33.8% vs -20.1% change in Ki-67 (endometrioid subcohort, PT+MA vs MA), p = 0.14
Not recorded as a finding: this platform holds no node for the endpoint
The endometrioid PT+MA group demonstrated a larger decrease in Ki-67 with a -33.8% change compared to −20.1% in the MA group, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.14, one-sided).
PMID 40227411 · one of two readings recorded this
Ki-67 proliferation index, immunohistochemistry (MIB-1, hot spot score), change from pre-treatment biopsy to post-treatment hysterectomy specimen; PT+MA versus MA, megestrol acetate given to both arms
endometrioid subcohort only: -33.8% change in PT+MA versus -20.1% in MA, p = 0.14
Not recorded as a finding: this platform holds no node for the endpoint
The endometrioid PT+MA group demonstrated a larger decrease in Ki-67 with a -33.8% change compared to −20.1% in the MA group, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.14, one-sided).
PMID 40227411 · one of two readings recorded this
Lipid metabolism parameters (HDL, LDL, triglycerides), pre- vs post-treatment
no effect
The evaluation of parameters related to lipid metabolism revealed no significant differences between pre- and post-treatment when analyzed in both arms (Arm 1, n = 17 and Arm 2, n = 16)
PMID 40227411 · one of two readings recorded this
Number of differentially expressed genes, PT+MA vs MA
modulates
Among endometrioid tumors, comparison of gene expression between PT+MA versus MA alone resulted in 117 differentially expressed genes between the arms (fold-change > 1.5, p < 0.05)
PMID 40227411 · one of two readings recorded this